Back to Search Start Over

Endoscopic Management of Urologic Complications Following Renal Transplantation: Impact of Ureteral Anastomosis

Authors :
Xavier Tillou
G. Raynal
Jacques Petit
M. Demailly
Fabien Saint
F. Hakami
Source :
Transplantation Proceedings. 41:3317-3319
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2009.

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the success of ureteral stent placement to treat or prepare for surgical treatment of urologic complications after renal transplantation, according to a type of ureteral anastomosis. Patient and methods. From May 1989 to December 2006, we performed 703 kidney transplantations including 412 extravesical ureteroneocystostomy (according to Lich-Gregoire technique) and 265 transvesical ureteroneocystostomy (according to Politano-Leadbetter technique). We retrospectively analyzed our endoscopic management of urinary leaks and ureteral strictures. The criteria of success were the feasibility to place a ureteral stent, permitting good drainage of the upper renal graft tract before further endoscopic or surgical treatment. Results. Forty-three urinary leaks or ureteral strictures occurred after extravesical ureteroneocystostomy (n = 21) or after Politano-Leadbetter anastomosis (n = 22). The success rate of endoscopic management was 75% (n = 16) for Politano-Leadbetter anastomosis versus 53% (n = 11) for the Lich-Gregoire anastomosis. There was no statistical difference (P = .1). Conclusion. Ureteroneocystostomy according to Lich-Gregoire procedure were twice less complicated than those according to the Politano-Leadbetter technique, but were associated with a rate of failure of ureteral stent placement in urgency higher to 25%.

Details

ISSN :
00411345
Volume :
41
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Transplantation Proceedings
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....36d8b045a2e58cc16f0752b2a0b76c6d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.08.046