Back to Search Start Over

Identifying the science and technology dimensions of emerging public policy issues through horizon scanning

Authors :
Kim Worts
Natasha McCarthy
Helen C. Bodmer
Edward J. Oughton
Elizabeth Surkovic
Patrick K. A. Wollner
Lucia Costanzo
Christopher L. Magee
Ross Neilson
Jonny Wentworth
Robert Doubleday
Amanda C. Hall
Sophie A. Rocks
Andrew R. Watkinson
Jason Chilvers
Jessica Bland
Ulrike Hotopp
David D. Cleevely
Tony McBride
David Oxenham
Miles Parker
James A. Dolan
Jackie Ouchikh
Arnoud J. Groen
Jim R. Bellingham
David Good
Andrew Acland
Leila M. Lueshi
James Palmer
Sarah Castell
Helen Pallett
Neil Stansfield
Alan Mercer
Wai Yi Feng
Gary Kass
Tim Leeder
William J. Sutherland
Harry J. Armstrong
Chris Tyler
Sunjai Gupta
Fiona A. Lickorish
Simon Burall
H. Charles J. Godfray
Tim Guilliams
Jeff Patmore
Judith Petts
Tiago Mata
Rebecca Willis
David R. Cope
Richard Ploszek
Jonathan Grant
Adam Heathfield
Alan Pratt
Nick Green
Jan Pinkerton
Source :
PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 5, p e96480 (2014)
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Public policy requires public support, which in turn implies a need to enable the public not just to understand policy but also to be engaged in its development. Where complex science and technology issues are involved in policy making, this takes time, so it is important to identify emerging issues of this type and prepare engagement plans. In our horizon scanning exercise, we used a modified Delphi technique [1]. A wide group of people with interests in the science and policy interface (drawn from policy makers, policy adviser, practitioners, the private sector and academics) elicited a long list of emergent policy issues in which science and technology would feature strongly and which would also necessitate public engagement as policies are developed. This was then refined to a short list of top priorities for policy makers. Thirty issues were identified within broad areas of business and technology; energy and environment; government, politics and education; health, healthcare, population and aging; information, communication, infrastructure and transport; and public safety and national security.Public policy requires public support, which in turn implies a need to enable the public not just to understand policy but also to be engaged in its development. Where complex science and technology issues are involved in policy making, this takes time, so it is important to identify emerging issues of this type and prepare engagement plans. In our horizon scanning exercise, we used a modified Delphi technique [1]. A wide group of people with interests in the science and policy interface (drawn from policy makers, policy adviser, practitioners, the private sector and academics) elicited a long list of emergent policy issues in which science and technology would feature strongly and which would also necessitate public engagement as policies are developed. This was then refined to a short list of top priorities for policy makers. Thirty issues were identified within broad areas of business and technology; energy and environment; government, politics and education; health, healthcare, population and aging; information, communication, infrastructure and transport; and public safety and national security.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 5, p e96480 (2014)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3722116d90c42d8f53472da433851474