Back to Search Start Over

The effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in chronic hepatitis C patients with refractory factors in the real world: a comprehensive analysis of a prospective multicenter study

Authors :
Naoki Hotta
Toshihide Shima
Norio Itokawa
Akio Moriya
Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Takashi Kumada
Makoto Nakamuta
Chisa Kondo
Shin Maeda
Toru Ishikawa
Shigeru Mikami
Taeang Arai
Shinichi Fujioka
Atsushi Hiraoka
Shinya Fukunishi
Makoto Chuma
Yasuhito Tanaka
Hidenori Toyoda
Hironao Okubo
Haruki Uojima
Noritomo Shimada
Takeshi Okanoue
Takehiro Akahane
Takuya Genda
Joji Tani
Shintaro Ogawa
Koichi Takaguchi
Tsunamasa Watanabe
Masanori Atsukawa
Hiroshi Abe
Hiroki Ikeda
Chikara Ogawa
Akihito Tsubota
Asahiro Morishita
Toru Asano
Yoshihiko Tachi
Akito Nozaki
Tadashi Ikegami
Source :
Hepatology International. 14:225-238
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Direct-acting anti-virals (DAAs) have markedly improved the effectiveness of anti-viral therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. In a phase III trial in Japan, treatment with the NS3/4A protease inhibitor glecaprevir and the NS5A inhibitor pibrentasvir (G/P) resulted in a small number of patients with refractory factors. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of G/P, especially among patients with these refractory factors, and the influence of these factors on treatment. In a prospective, multicenter study involving 33 medical institutions, 1439 patients were treated with G/P, and their efficacy, safety, and most frequent adverse effects (AEs) were analyzed. Overall SVR12 rates were 99.1% (1397/1410) in the per-protocol-analysis, and genotype sustained virologic response SVR12 rates were: genotype 1, 99.4% (707/711); genotype 2, 99.4% (670/674); genotype 3, 80.0% (16/20). DAA-naive patients (p = 0.008) with HCV genotype except 3 (genotype 1 vs. 3, p = 2.68 × 10–5; genotype 2 vs. 3, p = 3.28 × 10–5) had significantly higher SVR12 rates. No significant difference was observed between CKD stage 1–3 (99.1% [1209/1220]) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4–5 (98.9% [188/190]) patients, or between cirrhotic (99.0% [398/402]) and non-cirrhotic (99.1% [999/1008]) patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that genotype 3 [OR 33.404, 95% CI (7.512–148.550), p value (p = 4.06 × 10–5)] and past experience of IFN-free DAAs [OR 3.977, 95% CI (1.153–13.725), p value (p = 0.029)] were both significantly independent predictors of non-SVR12. AEs were reported in 28.2% of patients, and 1.6% discontinued treatment owing to drug-related AEs. AEs were significantly higher in CKD stage 4–5 (41.6% [79/190]) than CKD stage 1–3 (26.1% [319/1220]) patients (p = 2.00 × 10–5). AEs were also significantly higher in cirrhotic (38.6% [155/402]) than in non-cirrhotic (24.1% [243/1008]) (p = 2.91 × 10–18) patients. G/P regimen is highly effective and safe to treat CHC patients even with refractory factors such as CKD and advanced liver fibrosis. However, patients with past experience of IFN-free DAA treatment and genotype 3, CKD stage 4 or 5, and advanced liver fibrosis should be more closely observed.

Details

ISSN :
19360541 and 19360533
Volume :
14
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Hepatology International
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....37398fdeeaeb93023154fb7f4e4d5a96
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-020-10019-z