Anti-adalimumab antibodies in psoriasis: lack of clinical utility and laboratory evidence

Objective Adalimumab has proven effective in psoriasis; however, secondary failure may result from the drug9s immunogenicity. Prevalence data on the immunogenicity of biologicals, and of adalimumab in particular, are highly variable. We investigated the prevalence of anti-adalimumab antibodies and the association with clinical indexes and tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) serum levels in psoriatic patients. Design Case–control, longitudinal. Setting Single centre. Participants Patient groups: I (n=20) receiving biological therapies after switching from adalimumab; II (n=30) ongoing adalimumab therapy; III (n=30) novel adalimumab therapy; IV (n=15) biological therapies other than adalimumab. Healthy subjects : (group V; n=15) never treated with immunosuppressants or biologicals. Interventions All groups were tested at enrolment. Group II was also tested at 12 months, and group III at 1, 3, and 6 months. Primary and secondary outcome measures Standard clinical evaluations (Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)), blood samples and two-site ELISA-based measurement of serum adalimumab trough levels, anti-adalimumab antibodies and TNFα. Results The false-positive rate was 23% for adalimumab detection and 22% for anti-adalimumab antibodies in patients naive to adalimumab. Spurious positivity for anti-adalimumab antibodies (one-time-point positivity in group III during follow-up) accounted for 33% of the total. The prevalence of anti-drug antibodies was highest (87%) in group I patients. No correlations were found between the presence of anti-adalimumab antibodies or adalimumab levels and changes in PASI scores. Conclusions High variability of results, high prevalence of false-positives and lack of association between anti-adalimumab antibodies and TNFα level/PASI score limit this assay9s usefulness. Accurate clinical evaluation is key to early identification of treatment failures.