Back to Search Start Over

Impact of diabetes on clinical outcomes after revascularization with the dual therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent

Authors :
Lars Jakobsen
Evald H. Christiansen
Phillip Freeman
Johnny Kahlert
Karsten Veien
Michael Maeng
Bent Raungaard
Julia Ellert
Steen D. Kristensen
Martin K. Christensen
Christian J. Terkelsen
Troels Thim
Ashkan Eftekhari
Rebekka V. Jensen
Nicolaj B. Støttrup
Anders Junker
Henrik S. Hansen
Lisette O. Jensen
Source :
Jakobsen, L, Christiansen, E H, Freeman, P, Kahlert, J, Veien, K, Maeng, M, Raungaard, B, Ellert, J, Kristensen, S D, Christensen, M K, Terkelsen, C J, Thim, T, Eftekhari, A, Jensen, R V, Støttrup, N B, Junker, A, Hansen, H S & Jensen, L O 2022, ' Impact of diabetes on clinical outcomes after revascularization with the dual therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent ', Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1965-1975 . https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30175
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of the dual therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent (DTS) and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (SES) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) included in the Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome (SORT OUT) X study.BACKGROUND: The incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) after treatment with modern drug-eluting stents has been reported to be significantly higher in patients with DM when compared to patients without DM. Thus, whether the results from the SORT OUT X study apply to patients with and without DM remains unknown.METHODS: In total 3146 patients were randomized to stent implantation with DTS (n = 1578; DM: n = 279) or SES (n = 1568; DM: n = 271). The primary end point, TLF, was a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year.RESULTS: At 1 year, the rate of TLF was increased in the DTS group compared to the SES group, both among patients with DM (9.3% vs. 4.8%; risk difference: 4.5%; incidence rate ratio: 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-3.90) and without DM (5.7% vs. 3.5%; incidence rate ratio: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.15-2.42). The differences were mainly explained by higher rates of TLR.CONCLUSION: Compared to the SES, the DTS was associated with an increased risk of TLF at 12 months in patients with and without DM. The differences were mainly explained by higher rates of TLR, whereas rates of cardiac death and target lesion MI did not differ significantly between the two stent groups in patients with or without DM.

Details

ISSN :
1522726X
Volume :
99
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac AngiographyInterventions
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3842d975b26b865eaae4cffd0eb6e373
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30175