Back to Search
Start Over
Healthcare providers’ adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe: a systematic literature review
- Source :
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau, instname
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Purpose Clinical guidelines' (CGs) adherence supports high-quality care. However, healthcare providers do not always comply with CGs recommendations. This systematic literature review aims to assess the extent of healthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe and to identify the factors that impact on healthcare providers' adherence. Methods We searched for systematic reviews and quantitative or qualitative primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase up to May 2019. The eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and cross-checked by a second author. We conducted a narrative synthesis attending to the modality of the healthcare process, methods to measure adherence, the scope of the CGs, and population characteristics. Results Out of 8137 references, we included 41 primary studies conducted in eight European countries. Most followed a retrospective cohort design (19/41; 46%) and were at low or moderate risk of bias. Adherence for overall breast cancer care process (from diagnosis to follow-up) ranged from 54 to 69%; for overall treatment process [including surgery, chemotherapy (CT), endocrine therapy (ET), and radiotherapy (RT)] the median adherence was 57.5% (interquartile range (IQR) 38.8-67.3%), while for systemic therapy (CT and ET) it was 76% (IQR 68-77%). The median adherence for the processes assessed individually was higher, ranging from 74% (IQR 10-80%), for the follow-up, to 90% (IQR 87-92.5%) for ET. Internal factors that potentially impact on healthcare providers' adherence were their perceptions, preferences, lack of knowledge, or intentional decisions. Conclusions A substantial proportion of breast cancer patients are not receiving CGs-recommended care. Healthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe has room for improvement in almost all care processes. CGs development and implementation processes should address the main factors that influence healthcare providers' adherence, especially patient-related ones. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018092884).<br />The systematic review was carried out by the Iberoamerican Cochrane Center under Framework Contract 443094 for procurement of services between European Commission Joint Research Centre and Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana. YS is funded by China Scholarship Council (No. 201707040103). MR is funded by Sara Borrell contract (CD16/00157). AVM received a training Grant D43 TW007393 Fogarty International Centre of the US National Institutes of Health for the Emerging Diseases and Climate Change Research Unit of the School and Public Health Administration at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.
- Subjects :
- Evidence-based medicine
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Health Personnel
humanos
Population
MEDLINE
neoplasias de la mama
Breast Neoplasms
Review
Systemic therapy
Breast cancer
guías de práctica clínica como asunto
Interquartile range
Humans
Medicine
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
education
Quality of Health Care
education.field_of_study
business.industry
Guideline adherence
Retrospective cohort study
Guidelines as topic
medicine.disease
Systematic review
Oncology
Family medicine
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Female
Breast neoplasms
business
Delivery of Health Care
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15737217 and 01676806
- Volume :
- 181
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....38a6fbcb240757c49c7a97d96213e967
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05657-8