Back to Search Start Over

The Prognostic Significance of Biomarkers in Predicting Outcome in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Results of the Biomarker Sub-Study of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) Trials

Authors :
Alan S. Maisel
Carla A. Sueta
Stanislaw Wos
Ryan Walsh
Arthur M. Feldman
Kerry L. Lee
Dennis M. McNamara
Eric J. Velazquez
Gretchen L. Wells
Irene Lang
Douglas L. Mann
Daniel F. Pauly
Mark H. Drazner
John F. Schmedtje
Michael R. Bristow
Irving L. Kron
Michael Di Maio
Dorellyn L. Lee
Lilin She
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Background— Patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease often undergo coronary artery bypass grafting, but assessment of the risk of an adverse outcome in these patients is difficult. To evaluate the ability of biomarkers to contribute independent prognostic information in these patients, we measured levels in patients enrolled in the biomarker substudies of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trials. Patients in STICH Hypothesis 1 were randomized to medical therapy or coronary artery bypass grafting, whereas those in STICH Hypothesis 2 were randomized to coronary artery bypass grafting or coronary artery bypass grafting with left ventricular reconstruction. Methods and Results— In substudy patients assigned to STICH Hypothesis 1 (n=606), plasma levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor-α receptor-1 (sTNFR-1) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were highly predictive of the primary outcome variable of mortality by univariate analysis (BNP: χ 2 =40.6; P 2 =38.9; P 2 =30.3) and sTNFR-1 (χ 2 =45.5) were highly predictive in univariate analysis ( P 2 =6.0; P =0.049) and sTNFR-1 (χ 2 =8.8; P =0.003) remained statistically significant even after accounting for other clinical information. Although the biomarkers added little discriminatory improvement to the clinical factors (increase in c -index ≤0.1), net reclassification improvement for the primary end points was 0.29 for BNP and 0.21 for sTNFR-1 in the Hypothesis 1 cohort, and 0.15 for BNP and 0.30 for sTNFR-1 in the Hypothesis 2 cohort, reflecting important predictive improvement. Conclusions— Elevated levels of sTNFR-1 and BNP are strongly associated with outcomes, independent of therapy, in 2 large and independent studies, thus providing important cross-validation for the prognostic importance of these 2 biomarkers.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....390e37fbe16ab8a5f28e6f99aa1f9c77