Back to Search Start Over

Factors associated with compliance to cervical cancer screening in France: The EDIFICE 6 survey

Authors :
Thibault De La Motte Rouge
Chantal Touboul
Christine Lhomel
Morgan Rouprêt
Jean-François Morère
Centre Eugène Marquis (CRLCC)
Roche France
Groupe de Recherche Clinique Onco-Urologie Prédictive [CHU Tenon] (GRC 5)
CHU Tenon [AP-HP]
Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)
Source :
Gynecologic Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology, Elsevier, 2021, 160, pp.112-117. ⟨10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.032⟩
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

A nationwide cervical cancer (CC) screening program was implemented in France in 2018. Asymptomatic women are invited for a cytological test once every 3 years (age, 25-29 years), and an HPV test every 5 years (age, 30-65 years). We investigated the characteristics of women who are resistant to CC screening.Since 2005, the EDIFICE survey program has assessed attitudes toward cancer screening in France. The 6th edition (2017) included 12,046 representative women (age, 18-69 years). Social vulnerability was assessed using the EPICES score. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis identified factors correlated with nonuptake of CC screening.Questionnaires from 4499 women (age, 25-65 years) with no history of cancer were analyzed; 88% (N = 3960) reported at least one test in their lifetime, and 73% (N = 3262) did the test in the previous 3 years. Compared to ever-screened women, never-screened women were younger (38 ± 11 yrs. vs 44 ± 12 yrs., P 0.05), and more likely to be single (48% vs 20%, P 0.05) and/or socially vulnerable (59% vs 38%, P 0.05). In multivariate analysis, items significantly (P 0.05) associated with never screening included living alone (OR = 2.26, 95% CI [1.85-2.75]) and social vulnerability (OR = 1.95 [1.59-2.40]). Women who were not compliant with recommendations were more likely to be older (mean age, 49.2 yrs. vs. 43.2 yrs), living alone (single, widowed or divorced, 40% vs. 30%, P 0.05), and/or socially vulnerable (55% vs. 35%, P 0.05; OR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.49-2.12]).This analysis identified several factors associated with never screening and under-screening. Effective prevention messages should specifically target these populations.

Details

ISSN :
10956859 and 00908258
Volume :
160
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gynecologic oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....39864b30e1f1417ddd2079b3464bf56b