Back to Search Start Over

Brain activity patterns of phonemic representations are atypical in beginning readers with family risk for dyslexia

Authors :
Pol Ghesquière
Jan Wouters
Jolijn Vanderauwera
Maaike Vandermosten
Milene Bonte
Joao Correia
UCL - SSH/IPSY - Psychological Sciences Research Institute
UCL - SSS/IONS - Institute of NeuroScience
Language
RS: FPN CN 7
Source :
Developmental Science, Vol. 23, no.1, p. e12857 (2020), Developmental Science, 23(1):e12857. Wiley-Blackwell, Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación, instname
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Wiley, 2019.

Abstract

Version of Record online: 21 June 2019 There is an ongoing debate whether phonological deficits in dyslexics should be attributed to (a) less specified representations of speech sounds, like suggested by studies in young children with a familial risk for dyslexia, or (b) to an impaired access to these phonemic representations, as suggested by studies in adults with dyslexia. These conflicting findings are rooted in between study differences in sample characteristics and/or testing techniques. The current study uses the same multivariate functional MRI (fMRI) approach as previously used in adults with dyslexia to investigate phonemic representations in 30 beginning readers with a familial risk and 24 beginning readers without a familial risk of dyslexia, of whom 20 were later retrospectively classified as dyslexic. Based on fMRI response patterns evoked by listening to different utterances of /bA/ and /dA/ sounds, multivoxel analyses indicate that the underlying activation patterns of the two phonemes were distinct in children with a low family risk but not in children with high family risk. However, no group differences were observed between children that were later classified as typical versus dyslexic readers, regardless of their family risk status, indicating that poor phonemic representations constitute a risk for dyslexia but are not sufficient to result in reading problems. We hypothesize that poor phonemic representations are trait (family risk) and not state (dyslexia) dependent, and that representational deficits only lead to reading difficulties when they are present in conjunction with other neuroanatomical or—functional deficits. This research was funded by the Research Council of KU Leuven (OT/12/044), the Research Foundation Flanders (G0920.12), postdoctoral grant of Maaike Vandermosten (Research Foundation Flanders) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Vidi‐Grant 452‐16‐004 to Milene Bonte).

Details

ISSN :
14677687 and 1363755X
Volume :
23
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Developmental Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....39f26b64ab4aba7570b0afd389f9ad62