Back to Search Start Over

Mechanisms and Patterns of Intravascular Ultrasound In-Stent Restenosis Among Bare Metal Stents and First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents

Authors :
Mitsuaki Matsumura
Nobuaki Kobayashi
Manish Parikh
Jeffrey W. Moses
Tomotaka Dohi
LeRoy E. Rabbani
Martin B. Leon
Zhijing Zhao
Akiko Maehara
Kosaku Goto
Gary S. Mintz
Ajay J. Kirtane
Susheel Kodali
Michael B. Collins
Source :
The American Journal of Cardiology. 116:1351-1357
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2015.

Abstract

The most common causes of in-stent restenosis (ISR) are intimal hyperplasia and stent under expansion. The purpose of this study was to use intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to compare the ISR mechanisms of bare metal stents (BMS), first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), and second-generation DES. There were 298 ISR lesions including 52 BMS, 73 sirolimus-eluting stents, 52 paclitaxel-eluting stents, 16 zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 105 everolimus-eluting stent. Mean patient age was 66.6 ± 1.1 years, 74.2% were men, and 48.3% had diabetes mellitus. BMS restenosis presented later (70.0 ± 66.7 months) with more intimal hyperplasia compared with DES (BMS 58.6 ± 15.5%, first-generation DES 52.6 ± 20.9%, second-generation DES 48.2 ± 22.2%, p = 0.02). Although reference lumen areas were similar in BMS and first- and second-generation DES, restenotic DES were longer (BMS 21.8 ± 13.5 mm, first-generation DES 29.4 ± 16.1 mm, second-generation DES 32.1 ± 18.7 mm, p = 0.003), and stent areas were smaller (BMS 7.2 ± 2.4 mm(2), first-generation DES 6.1 ± 2.1 mm(2), second-generation DES 5.7 ± 2.0 mm(2), p0.001). Stent fracture was seen only in DES (first-generation DES 7 [5.0%], second-generation DES 8 [7.4%], p = 0.13). In conclusion, restenotic first- and second-generation DES were characterized by less neointimal hyperplasia, smaller stent areas, longer stent lengths, and more stent fractures than restenotic BMS.

Details

ISSN :
00029149
Volume :
116
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The American Journal of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3a18ea9646929dfc0a51bf44699da148
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.058