Back to Search Start Over

Current role of β-adrenergic blockers in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure

Authors :
Jessica Beal
Patrick J. Bryant
Harold J. Manley
Andrew J. Smith
Jessica S. Wehner
Antoine D. Richardson
Source :
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 58:140-145
Publication Year :
2001
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2001.

Abstract

Recent findings on the use of beta-adrenergic blockers in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) are reviewed. CHF is a progressive, debilitating disease that afflicts 4.6 million patients in the United States. Treatment has traditionally consisted of a diuretic, an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and digoxin. Despite advances in ACE-inhibitor therapy, the five-year mortality rate remains nearly 50%. Overstimulation of the sympathetic nervous system is believed to contribute to mortality. Beta-blockers have recently been added to the standard of care for patients with New York Heart Association functional class II or III heart failure. Four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials were recently completed that addressed the benefits of beta-blockers in CHF. The overall mortality rate was reduced 65% by carvedilol, 34% by metoprolol, and 33% by bisoprolol; all these reductions were significant compared with placebo, and the trials were ended early. Bucindolol, however, did not have a significant effect on mortality. These drugs are hepatically metabolized and may require dosage adjustment in hepatically impaired patients. Decompensation of heart failure is another consideration; a beta-blocker should be added only for patients with stable CHF. Dosages must be slowly adjusted to targeted levels. Adverse effects do not differ significantly among beta-blockers. In addition to their effect on mortality, beta-blockers reduce CHF-related morbidity, such as all-cause hospitalization. Carvedilol, metoprolol, and bisoprolol decrease the mortality and morbidity associated with CHF and can be used with limited adverse effects. The choice among these agents does not affect clinical outcomes; bucindolol, however, has proven ineffective.

Details

ISSN :
15352900 and 10792082
Volume :
58
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3b21d4e88b4bbe4064aca4a8b30c9525
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/58.2.140