Back to Search Start Over

Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials

Authors :
Andrea de Matteis
Gennaro Daniele
Ciro Gallo
Francesco Perrone
Maria Carmela Piccirillo
Cesare Gridelli
Simona Signoriello
Fortunato Ciardiello
Ronald Feld
Charles Butts
Anna Ceribelli
Vittorio Gebbia
Gaetano Rocco
Massimo Di Maio
Jane Bryce
Adolfo Favaretto
Sabino De Placido
Alessandro Morabito
Francesco Nuzzo
Natasha B. Leighl
Di Maio, M
Gallo, Ciro
Leighl, N. B.
Piccirillo, M. C.
Daniele, G
Nuzzo, F
Gridelli, C
Gebbia, V
Ciardiello, Fortunato
De Placido, S
Ceribelli, A
Favaretto, A. G.
de Matteis, A
Feld, R
Butts, C
Bryce, J
Signoriello, Simona
Morabito, A
Rocco, G
Perrone, F.
Di Maio, Massimo
Leighl, Natasha B.
Piccirillo, Maria Carmela
Daniele, Gennaro
Nuzzo, Francesco
Gridelli, Cesare
Gebbia, Vittorio
DE PLACIDO, Sabino
Ceribelli, Anna
Favaretto, Adolfo G.
De Matteis, Andrea
Feld, Ronald
Butts, Charle
Bryce, Jane
Morabito, Alessandro
Rocco, Gaetano
Perrone, Francesco
Source :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 33(8)
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Purpose Information about symptomatic toxicities of anticancer treatments is not based on direct report by patients, but rather on reports by clinicians in trials. Given the potential for under-reporting, our aim was to compare reporting by patients and physicians of six toxicities (anorexia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and hair loss) within three randomized trials. Patients and Methods In one trial, elderly patients with breast cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy; in two trials, patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer received first-line treatment. Toxicity was prospectively collected by investigators (graded by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0] or Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3]). At the end of each cycle, patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaires, including toxicity-related symptom items. Possible answers were “not at all,” “a little,” “quite a bit,” and “very much.” Analysis was limited to the first three cycles. For each toxicity, agreement between patients and physicians and under-reporting by physicians (ie, toxicity reported by patients but not reported by physicians) were calculated. Results Overall, 1,090 patients (2,482 cycles) were included. Agreement between patients and physicians was low for all toxicities. Toxicity rates reported by physicians were always lower than those reported by patients. For patients who reported toxicity (any severity), under-reporting by physicians ranged from 40.7% to 74.4%. Examining only patients who reported “very much” toxicity, under-reporting by physicians ranged from 13.0% to 50.0%. Conclusion Subjective toxicities are at high risk of under-reporting by physicians, even when prospectively collected within randomized trials. This strongly supports the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into toxicity reporting in clinical trials.

Details

ISSN :
15277755
Volume :
33
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3ce30431b8e06abcdea46ed81a45f488