Back to Search Start Over

Utilizing a large-scale biobanking registry to assess patient priorities and preferences for cancer research and education

Authors :
Susan T. Vadaparampil
Christine H. Chung
Shelley S. Tworoger
Smitha Pabbathi
Erin M. Siegel
Cassandra A. Hathaway
Jennifer Vidrine
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 2, p e0246686 (2021), PLoS ONE
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2021.

Abstract

Patients consented to biobanking studies typically do not specify research conducted on their samples and data. Our objective was to gauge cancer biobanking participant preferences on research topics. Patient-participants of a biobanking study at a comprehensive cancer center who had an appointment within the last 5 years, had a valid email address, and with a last known vital status of alive, were emailed a newsletter containing a link to a survey about preferences and priorities for research. The survey assessed demographics and research interest in three domains: cancer site, cancer-related topics, and issues faced by cancer patients. 37,384 participants were contacted through email to participate in the survey. 16,158 participants (43.2%) opened the email, 1,626 (4.3% overall, 10% of those who opened the email) completed the survey, and 1,291 (79.4% of those who completed the survey) selected at least one research priority. Among those who selected at least one research priorities for cancer-relevant topics, the most commonly selected were cancer treatment (66%), clinical trials (54%), and cancer prevention (53%). Similarly, the most selected priorities for cancer-related issues faced by patients were physical side effects of cancer (57%), talking to the oncologist (53%), and emotional challenges due to cancer (47%). Differences by gender were observed, with females reporting more interest in research generally. Cancer patients participating in a biobanking protocol prioritized research on treatments, prevention and side effects, which varied by gender.

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
16
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLOS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3ce8bbd9c26dd9c6074f15b43af4215e