Factors Associated With Revascularization in Women With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Acute Myocardial Infarction

In contrast to atherosclerotic acute myocardial infarction (AMI), conservative therapy is considered preferable in the acute management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) if clinically possible. The present study aimed to investigate factors associated with treatment strategy for SCAD. Women aged ≤60 years with AMI and SCAD were retrospectively identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2010 to 2015 and were divided into revascularization and conservative therapy groups. The revascularization group (n = 1,273, 68.0%), compared with the conservative therapy group (n = 600, 32.0%), had ST-elevation AMI (STEMI) (anterior STEMI, 20.3% vs 10.5%; inferior STEMI, 25.1% vs 14.5%; p0.001) and cardiogenic shock (10.8% vs 1.8%; p0.001) more frequently. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that anterior STEMI (vs non-STEMI, odds ratio 2.89 [95% confidence interval 2.08 to 4.00]), inferior STEMI (2.44 [1.85 to 3.21]), and cardiogenic shock (5.13 [2.68 to 9.80]) were strongly associated with revascularization. Other factors associated with revascularization were diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, renal failure, and pregnancy/delivery-related conditions; whereas known fibromuscular dysplasia and admission to teaching hospitals were associated with conservative therapy. Propensity-score matched analyses (546 pairs) found no significant difference in in-hospital death, 30-day readmission, and recurrent AMI between the groups. In conclusion, STEMI presentation, hemodynamic instability, co-morbidities, and setting of treating hospital may affect treatment strategy in women with AMI and SCAD. Further efforts are required to understand which patients benefit most from revascularization over conservative therapy in the setting of SCAD causing AMI.