Echocardiographic and pathologic features of explanted Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position

Modes of failure of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards (C-E) porcine bioprosthetic valves placed in the mitral position are not completely understood. We reviewed transesophageal echocardiographic (n = 19) and pathologic features of failed Hancock (n = 22) and C-E (n = 8) porcine mitral valves in 30 patients (mean age 70 +/- 13 years). Age at implantation (59 +/- 14 vs 58 +/-14 years, p = 0.9), time to implanted valve degeneration (13 +/- 5 vs 11 +/- 2 years, p = 0.3), and size of bioprosthesis (30 +/- 2 vs 31 +/- 2 mm, p = 0.14) of the implanted Hancock and C-E valves were similar. Anterior leaflet was flail in 15 versus flail posterior leaflet in 5 patients (p = 0.0004). Eccentric posterior mitral regurgitation jet was present in 12, eccentric anterior jet in 2, central jet in 2, and paravalvular jet in 3 patients. Stenosis of bioprosthesis was present in 1 1 Hancock versus 1 C-E valve (p = 0.06). Stent creep at any stent post was present in 14 Hancock versus no C-E valve (p = 0.0013). Large commissural dehiscence was present in 5 C-E versus 1 Hancock valve (p = 0.0006). Ring margin perforation was the most common perforation in Hancock valves (p