Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of novel methods for predicting the risk of pro-inflammatory clinical infusion reactions during monoclonal antibody therapy

Authors :
Chris Bird
Richard Stebbings
Robin Thorpe
Lucy Findlay
Susan J. Thorpe
David Eastwood
C. Jane Robinson
Stephen Poole
Christina Ball
Meenu Wadhwa
Source :
Journal of Immunological Methods. 371:134-142
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2011.

Abstract

Two methods for predicting the risk of pro-inflammatory clinical infusion reactions during monoclonal antibody therapy were evaluated. In the first, the antibody of interest is immobilised by air-drying onto 96-well plates prior to the addition of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). In the second, the antibody is added in aqueous phase to a co-culture of human PBMCs and human endothelium-derived cells. In both methods the cells are incubated with the antibody to allow the accumulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The antibodies associated with clinical infusion reactions, Herceptin, Campath-1H and TGN1412, gave the largest responses taking into account the data for all readouts (tumour necrosis factor-α, TNF, interleukin-6, IL-6, IL-8, IL-2 and cell proliferation) for both methods. Overall, the antibodies tested could be ranked as follows: Tysabri

Details

ISSN :
00221759
Volume :
371
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Immunological Methods
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3eecc34f783065e9e6ca0baea4c45aac
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2011.06.022