Back to Search Start Over

Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN

Authors :
Nicolynn C. Cole
Peggy C. Kohner
Sukantha Chandrasekaran
Sherry M. Ihde
Annabelle de St Maurice
Jennifer Curello
Michelle Earley
Nipunie S Rajapakse
William Swearingen
Abinash Virk
Katelyn A. Reed
Lauren Komarow
Lisa E. Hines
Robin Patel
Audrey N. Schuetz
Omai B. Garner
Brenda L. Dylla
Meganne Kanatani
Rubi Arias
Sarah B Doernberg
Judith J. Lok
Ritu Banerjee
Source :
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, vol 73, iss 1, Clin Infect Dis
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020.

Abstract

Background Rapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC) culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs rapid organism identification (ID) and phenotypic AST using the Accelerate Pheno System (RAPID). Methods Patients with positive blood cultures with Gram stains showing GNB were randomized to SOC testing with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) review or RAPID with AS. The primary outcome was time to first antibiotic modification within 72 hours of randomization. Results Of 500 randomized patients, 448 were included (226 SOC, 222 RAPID). Mean (standard deviation) time to results was faster for RAPID than SOC for organism ID (2.7 [1.2] vs 11.7 [10.5] hours; P Conclusions Rapid organism ID and phenotypic AST led to faster changes in antibiotic therapy for gram-negative BSIs. Clinical Trials Registration NCT03218397.

Details

ISSN :
15376591 and 10584838
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3f3ff17d10418350f3218d0cde521f20