Back to Search
Start Over
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: A prospective assessment
- Source :
- British Journal of Surgery. 81:133-135
- Publication Year :
- 1994
- Publisher :
- Oxford University Press (OUP), 1994.
-
Abstract
- A prospective study of 200 consecutive patients with suspected acute appendicitis was performed to compare open and laparoscopic appendicectomy. Formal randomization was precluded by instrument availability. Some 100 patients underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy (conversion to laparotomy was carried out in five) and 100 had conventional surgery. The groups were similar in sex ratio, age, degree of appendiceal inflammation and antibiotic treatment. The mean duration of open appendicectomy was 46 min and of the laparoscopic procedure 51 min (P not significant). Postoperative complications in patients who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy included: intraabdominal abscess (two patients), wound infection (one), early bowel obstruction (four all resolved with medical treatment) and umbilical haematoma (two). There were no reoperations in the immediate or late postoperative period. Complications after open operation were: wound infection (seven patients) (P < 0·05), early bowel obstruction (five; three resolved with medical treatment, two required surgery) and haematoma of the Surgical wound (one). The mean hospital stay was 4·8 days for laparoscopic appendicectomy and 6·0 days for the open operation (P < 0·05). There were no deaths.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
medicine.medical_treatment
Hematoma
Laparotomy
medicine
Appendectomy
Humans
Prospective Studies
Child
Laparoscopy
Prospective cohort study
Abscess
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
General surgery
Surgical wound
Length of Stay
Middle Aged
Appendicitis
medicine.disease
Surgery
Bowel obstruction
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 13652168 and 00071323
- Volume :
- 81
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- British Journal of Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....40117281c913903d622dfdf67f12737b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800810148