Back to Search Start Over

Impact of relational continuity of primary care in aged care: a systematic review

Authors :
Gillian E. Caughey
Gillian Harvey
Maria Crotty
David Roder
Steven Lodewyk Wesselingh
Jenni Suen
Suzanne M Dyer
Maria C.S. Inacio
Helena Williams
Andrew Kellie
Dyer, Suzanne M
Suen, Jenni
Williams, Helena
Inacio, Maria
Harvey, Gillian
Roder, David
Wesselingh, Steve
Kellie, Andrew
Crotty, Maria
Caughey, Gillian E
Source :
BMC geriatrics. 22(1)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background Greater continuity of care has been associated with lower hospital admissions and patient mortality. This systematic review aims to examine the impact of relational continuity between primary care professionals and older people receiving aged care services, in residential or home care settings, on health care resource use and person-centred outcomes. Methods Systematic review of five databases, four trial registries and three grey literature sources to October 2020. Included studies (a) aimed to increase relational continuity with a primary care professional, (b) focused on older people receiving aged care services (c) included a comparator and (d) reported outcomes of health care resource use, quality of life, activities of daily living, mortality, falls or satisfaction. Cochrane Collaboration or Joanna Briggs Institute criteria were used to assess risk of bias and GRADE criteria to rate confidence in evidence and conclusions. Results Heterogeneity in study cohorts, settings and outcome measurement in the five included studies (one randomised) precluded meta-analysis. None examined relational continuity exclusively with non-physician providers. Higher relational continuity with a primary care physician probably reduces hospital admissions (moderate certainty evidence; high versus low continuity hazard ratio (HR) 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92–0.96, n = 178,686; incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.99, 95%CI 0.76–1.27, n = 246) and emergency department (ED) presentations (moderate certainty evidence; high versus low continuity HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.89–0.92, n = 178,686; IRR 0.91, 95%CI 0.72–1.15, n = 246) for older community-dwelling aged care recipients. The benefit of providing on-site primary care for relational continuity in residential settings is uncertain (low certainty evidence, 2 studies, n = 2,468 plus 15 care homes); whilst there are probably lower hospitalisations and may be fewer ED presentations, there may also be an increase in reported mortality and falls. The benefit of general practitioners’ visits during hospital admission is uncertain (very low certainty evidence, 1 study, n = 335). Conclusion Greater relational continuity with a primary care physician probably reduces hospitalisations and ED presentations for community-dwelling aged care recipients, thus policy initiatives that increase continuity may have cost offsets. Further studies of approaches to increase relational continuity of primary care within aged care, particularly in residential settings, are needed. Review registration CRD42021215698.

Details

ISSN :
14712318
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC geriatrics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....40bfcdd0f99a84a9fd222a457754cd25