Back to Search Start Over

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Precision Vestibular Rehabilitation in Adolescents following Concussion: Preliminary Findings

Authors :
Anne Mucha
Claire Moldolvan
Cyndi L. Holland
Nicholas A. Blaney
Michael W. Collins
Anthony P. Kontos
Victoria Kochick
Shawn R. Eagle
Jessica Reichard
Source :
The Journal of Pediatrics. 239:193-199
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Objective To compare the effectiveness of a 4-week precision vestibular rehabilitation intervention compared with a behavioral management control intervention for adolescents with vestibular symptoms/impairment within 21 days of a concussion. Study design This study used double-blind, randomized controlled trial design involving adolescent (12-18 years) patients with a diagnosed sport/recreation-related concussion with vestibular symptoms/impairment from a concussion-specialty clinic between October 2018 and February 2020. Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 to either a 4-week vestibular intervention group (VESTIB) or a behavioral management control group (CONTROL). CONTROLS (n = 25) were prescribed behavioral management strategies (eg, physical activity, sleep, hydration, nutrition, stress management) and instructed to perform stretching/physical activity (eg, walking, stationary cycle) 30 minutes/day. VESTIB (n = 25) were prescribed precision vestibular rehabilitation exercises and instructed to perform at-home exercises for 30 minutes/day. Primary outcomes were improvement in Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening vestibular items (ie, horizontal/vertical vestibular-ocular reflex, visual motion sensitivity) at 4 weeks postenrollment. Results We screened 310 and enrolled a total of 55 (18%) adolescent patients who were randomized to one of the interventions. Fifty of fifty-five (91%) participants completed all aspects of the study protocol. Participants in VESTIB improved significantly across the intervention period in horizontal (mean difference-1.628; 95% CI [-3.20, −0.06]; P = .04) and vertical (mean difference-2.24; 95% CI [-4.01, −0.48]; P = .01) vestibular-ocular reflex, but not visual motion sensitivity (mean difference-2.03; 95% CI [-4.26, 0.19]) of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening score compared with CONTROLS. Conclusions Overall, the vestibular intervention group experienced greater clinical improvements in vestibular symptoms/impairment than controls across the 4-week intervention. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03555370.

Details

ISSN :
00223476
Volume :
239
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Pediatrics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....414041d7ccd60fe04bc1f8c178dd6ef6