Back to Search Start Over

Response to Li and Hopper

Authors :
Roger L. Milne
Jane C. Figueiredo
Kenneth Offit
Daniel D. Buchanan
Wendy K. Chung
Robert J. MacInnis
Marc J. Gunter
Catherine M. Tangen
Li Hsu
Emily White
Peter T. Campbell
Stéphane Bézieau
Andrew T. Chan
David C. Muller
Lori C. Sakoda
Bahram Namjou
Annika Lindblom
Temitope O. Keku
Vicente Martín
D. Timothy Bishop
Amit Joshi
Robert E. Schoen
Ludmila Vodickova
Mark A. Jenkins
Pavel Vodicka
Richard B. Hayes
Antoni Castells
Hermann Brenner
Daniel J. Schaid
David Duggan
Christopher I. Li
Mingyang Song
John B. Harley
Jeffrey K. Lee
Ozan Dikilitas
Douglas A. Corley
Neil Murphy
Steven Gallinger
Cornelia M. Ulrich
Victor Moreno
Clemens Schafmayer
Elizabeth A. Platz
Noralane M. Lindor
Elisabeth A. Rosenthal
Alicja Wolk
Yu Ru Su
Martha L. Slattery
Hakon Hakonarson
Stephen B. Gruber
Eric B. Larson
Graham G. Giles
Demetrius Albanes
Jenny Chang-Claude
Christopher H. Dampier
David R. Crosslin
Michael Hoffmeister
Andrea Gsur
Stephen N. Thibodeau
Shuji Ogino
Frank D. Mentch
Sonja I. Berndt
Bethany Van Guelpen
Kala Visvanathan
Loic Le Marchand
John D. Potter
Jeroen R. Huyghe
Heather Hampel
Gail P. Jarvik
Jochen Hampe
Graham Casey
Wei-Qi Wei
David A. Drew
Corinne E. Joshu
Aung Ko Win
Qianchuan He
Paul D.P. Pharoah
Michael O. Woods
Flora Qu
Ulrike Peters
Minta Thomas
Fränzel J.B. Van Duijnhoven
Ian B. Stanaway
Keith R. Curtis
Tabitha A. Harrison
Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman
Anna H. Wu
Edward Giovannucci
Li Li
Volker Arndt
Mathieu Lemire
Thomas J. Hudson
Albert de la Chapelle
Veronika Vymetalkova
Syed H.E. Zaidi
Jessica Minnier
Polly A. Newcomb
Sergi Castellví-Bel
Source :
American Journal of Human Genetics 108 (2021) 3, Am J Hum Genet, American Journal of Human Genetics, 108(3), 527-529
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Accurate colorectal cancer (CRC) risk prediction models are critical for identifying individuals at low and high risk of developing CRC, as they can then be offered targeted screening and interventions to address their risks of developing disease (if they are in a high-risk group) and avoid unnecessary screening and interventions (if they are in a low-risk group). As it is likely that thousands of genetic variants contribute to CRC risk, it is clinically important to investigate whether these genetic variants can be used jointly for CRC risk prediction. In this paper, we derived and compared different approaches to generating predictive polygenic risk scores (PRS) from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) including 55,105 CRC-affected case subjects and 65,079 control subjects of European ancestry. We built the PRS in three ways, using (1) 140 previously identified and validated CRC loci; (2) SNP selection based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) clumping followed by machine-learning approaches; and (3) LDpred, a Bayesian approach for genome-wide risk prediction. We tested the PRS in an independent cohort of 101,987 individuals with 1,699 CRC-affected case subjects. The discriminatory accuracy, calculated by the age- and sex-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), was highest for the LDpred-derived PRS (AUC = 0.654) including nearly 1.2 M genetic variants (the proportion of causal genetic variants for CRC assumed to be 0.003), whereas the PRS of the 140 known variants identified from GWASs had the lowest AUC (AUC = 0.629). Based on the LDpred-derived PRS, we are able to identify 30% of individuals without a family history as having risk for CRC similar to those with a family history of CRC, whereas the PRS based on known GWAS variants identified only top 10% as having a similar relative risk. About 90% of these individuals have no family history and would have been considered average risk under current screening guidelines, but might benefit from earlier screening. The developed PRS offers a way for risk-stratified CRC screening and other targeted interventions.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00029297
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Human Genetics 108 (2021) 3, Am J Hum Genet, American Journal of Human Genetics, 108(3), 527-529
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....41a27a902c73d2bcc912839b7ebe829c