Back to Search
Start Over
Vulvodynia: What We Know and Where We Should Be Going
- Source :
- Havemann, LM; Cool, DR; Gagneux, P; Markey, MP; Yaklic, JL; Maxwell, RA; et al.(2017). Vulvodynia: What We Know and Where We Should Be Going. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 21(2), 150-156. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000289. UC San Diego: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1rf6x9ch, Journal of lower genital tract disease, vol 21, iss 2
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- eScholarship, University of California, 2017.
-
Abstract
- Author(s): Havemann, Logan M; Cool, David R; Gagneux, Pascal; Markey, Michael P; Yaklic, Jerome L; Maxwell, Rose A; Iyer, Ashvin; Lindheim, Steven R | Abstract: ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to review the current nomenclature and literature examining microbiome cytokine, genomic, proteomic, and glycomic molecular biomarkers in identifying markers related to the understanding of the pathophysiology and diagnosis of vulvodynia (VVD).Materials and methodsComputerized searches of MEDLINE and PubMed were conducted focused on terminology, classification, and "omics" variations of VVD. Specific MESH terms used were VVD, vestibulodynia, metagenomics, vaginal fungi, cytokines, gene, protein, inflammation, glycomic, proteomic, secretomic, and genomic from 2001 to 2016. Using combined VVD and vestibulodynia MESH terms, 7 references were identified related to vaginal fungi, 15 to cytokines, 18 to gene, 43 to protein, 38 to inflammation, and 2 to genomic. References from identified publications were manually searched and cross-referenced to identify additional relevant articles. A narrative synthesis of the articles was conducted; however, meta-analysis was not conducted because of substantial heterogeneity in the studies and limited numbers of control-matched studies.ResultsVarying definitions of VVD complicate a meta-analysis, and standard definitions will better allow for comparisons of studies and enhance the applicability of evidence to patient populations. Although data are still limited, genomic and molecular diagnostic testings continue to be investigated as potential tools for the diagnosis of VVD.ConclusionsStandardized nomenclature will allow for comparability of studies and progress in research related to the pathophysiology of VVD and to facilitate clinical decision making and treatment choices. Although the current understanding of the pathogenesis of VVD is limited, there are new opportunities to explore potential diagnostic markers differences in women with VVD, which may lead to targeted therapy.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
Vulvodynia
medicine.medical_treatment
Clinical Sciences
MEDLINE
microbiome
Genomics
Computational biology
vulvodynia
Terminology
Targeted therapy
glycomics
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
proteomics
Terminology as Topic
medicine
genomics
Humans
Microbiome
Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine
business.industry
Obstetrics and Gynecology
General Medicine
medicine.disease
Molecular biomarkers
030104 developmental biology
Metagenomics
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Havemann, LM; Cool, DR; Gagneux, P; Markey, MP; Yaklic, JL; Maxwell, RA; et al.(2017). Vulvodynia: What We Know and Where We Should Be Going. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 21(2), 150-156. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000289. UC San Diego: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1rf6x9ch, Journal of lower genital tract disease, vol 21, iss 2
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....42f2dfd4f2b8b6745c7354977ff644bf
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000289.