Back to Search Start Over

Protocol for a systematic review of guidelines for rigour in the design, conduct and analysis of biomedical experiments involving laboratory animals

Authors :
Thomas Steckler
Jan Vollert
Esther Schenker
Anton Bespalov
Hanno Wuerbel
Martin Christian Michel
Heidrun Potschka
Kimberley E Wever
Bruce Altevogt
Andrew S C Rice
Judi Clark
Bruno Boulanger
Gernot Riedel
Bettina Platt
Annesha Sil
Martien J Kas
Bernhard Voelkl
Mathias Jucker
Bettina M Wegenast-braun
René Bernard
Esmeralda Heiden
Ann-marie Waldron
Maarten Loos
Tom Van De casteele
Pim Drinkenburg
Juan Diego Pita almenar
David Gallacher
Henk Van Der linde
Anja Gilis
Greet Teuns
Karsten Wicke
Sabine Grote
Bernd Sommer
Janet Nicholson
Sanna Janhunen
Sami Virtanen
Kristin Cheng
Sylvie Ramboz
Emer Leahy
Isabel A Lefevre
Fiona Ducrey
Javier Guillen
Patri Vergara
Thomas Ingraham
Source :
BMJ Open Science, BMJ Open Science, Vol 2, Iss 1 (2018), Vollert, J, Schenker, E, Macleod, M, Bespalov, A, Wuerbel, H, Michel, M C, Dirnagl, U, Potschka, H, Wever, K E, Steckler, T, Altevogt, B & Rice, A S C 2018, ' Protocol for a systematic review of guidelines for rigour in the design, conduct and analysis of biomedical experiments involving laboratory animals ', BMJ Open Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. e000004 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2018-000004, Vollert, Jan; Schenker, Esther; Macleod, Malcolm; Bespalov, Anton; Würbel, Hanno; Michel, Martin Christian; Dirnagl, Ulrich; Potschka, Heidrun; Wever, Kimberley E; Steckler, Thomas; Altevogt, Bruce; Rice, Andrew S C (2018). Protocol for a systematic review of guidelines for rigour in the design, conduct and analysis of biomedical experiments involving laboratory animals. BMJ open science, 2(1), e000004. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bmjos-2018-000004
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective Within the last years, there has been growing awareness of the negative repercussions of unstandardized planning, conduct and reporting of preclinical and biomedical research. Several initiatives have set the aim of increasing validity and reliability in reporting of studies and publications, and publishers have formed similar groups. Additionally, several groups of experts across the biomedical spectrum have published experience and opinion-based guidelines and guidance on potential standardized reporting. While all these guidelines cover reporting of experiments, an important step prior to this should be rigours planning and conduction of studies. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and harmonize existing experimental design, conduct and analysis guidelines relating to internal validity and reproducibility of preclinical animal research. The review will also identify literature describing risks of bias pertaining to the design, conduct and analysis of preclinical biomedical research. Search strategy PubMed, Embase and Web of Science will be searched systematically to identify guidelines published in English language in peer-reviewed journals before January 2018 (box 1). All articles or systematic reviews in English language that describe or review guidelines on the internal validity and reproducibility of animal studies will be included. Google search for guidelines published on the websites of major funders and professional organisations can be found in (Box 2). Screening and annotation Unique references will be screened in two phases: screening for eligibility based on title and abstract, followed by screening for definitive inclusion based on full text. Screening will be performed in SyRF (http://syrf.org.uk). Each reference will be randomly presented to two independent reviewers. Disagreements between reviewers will be resolved by additional screening of the reference by a third, senior researcher. Data management and reporting All data, including extracted text and guidelines, will be stored in the SyRF platform. Elements of the included guidelines will be identified using a standardized extraction form. Reporting will follow the PRISMA guidelines as far as applicable.

Details

ISSN :
23988703
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMJ Open Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....45451d537d3977c8a94faa520489db09
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2018-000004