Back to Search Start Over

Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Conventionally Fractionated External Beam Radiotherapy Compared with Active Surveillance Among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

Authors :
James R. Broughman
Ronald C. Chen
Dominic H. Moon
Jerry Chang
Zachary Crawford
Gregg A. Dickerson
David E. Morris
Paul A. Godley
R. Basak
Mark Perman
Turner Wibbelsman
Deborah S. Usinger
Maili Lim
Source :
Eur Urol
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

Background Evidence supporting the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer is accumulating, but comparative studies of patient-reported quality of life (QOL) following SBRT versus conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or active surveillance (AS) are limited. Objective To compare QOL of patients pursuing SBRT and EBRT versus AS. Design, setting, and participants A population-based cohort of 680 men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer was prospectively enrolled from 2011 to 2013. Intervention SBRT, EBRT without androgen deprivation therapy, or AS. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis QOL was prospectively assessed before treatment (baseline), and at 3, 12, and 24 mo after treatment using the validated Prostate Cancer Symptom Indices, which contain four domains: sexual dysfunction, urinary obstruction/irritation, urinary incontinence, and bowel problems. Propensity weighting via logistic regression models was used to balance baseline characteristics, and the mean QOL scores of EBRT and SBRT patients were compared against AS patients as the control group. Results and limitations Compared with AS patients, EBRT patients had worse urinary obstructive/irritative symptoms and sexual dysfunction at 3 mo, and worse bowel symptoms at 3 and 24 mo. SBRT patients had similar scores as AS patients in all domains and across all time points; however, due to small sample size, worse sexual function and urinary incontinence in SBRT patients cannot be ruled out. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes. Conclusions In a nonrandomized cohort of men with localized prostate cancer, SBRT appeared to result in favorable QOL results through 2 yr of follow-up, but worse sexual function and urinary incontinence compared with AS cannot be ruled out completely. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings. Patient summary Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and active surveillance appear to have similar quality of life outcomes through 2 yr, although worse sexual function and urinary incontinence from SBRT cannot be ruled out completely.

Details

ISSN :
03022838
Volume :
76
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....454ac31849fa2e7b09074de4807845f1
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.026