Back to Search Start Over

Cognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (The CINS Trial): A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Trial Comparing a Brief Intervention with Additional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Seal Oil, and Soy Oil for Sick-Listed Low Back Pain Patients

Authors :
Torill Helene Tveito
Egil Andreas Fors
Livar Frøyland
Stein Atle Lie
Silje Endresen Reme
Anette Harris
Arit Ødegård
Sigmund Østgård Gismervik
Jens Ivar Brox
Tone Tangen
Astrid Grasdal
Trudie Chalder
Aage Indahl
Hege R. Eriksen
Eli Molde Hagen
Source :
Spine, Reme, S E, Tveito, T H, Harris, A, Atle Lie, S, Grasdal, A, Indahl, A, Ivar Brox, J, Tangen, T, Molde Hagen, E, Gismervik, S, Ødegard, A, Frøyland, L, Fors, E, Chalder, T & Eriksen, H R 2016, ' Cognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (The CINS Trial) : A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Trial Comparing a Brief Intervention With Additional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Seal Oil, and Soy Oil for Sick-Listed Low Back Pain Patients ', Spine, vol. 41, no. 20, pp. 1557–1564 . https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001596
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a tailored and manualized cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) or nutritional supplements of seal oil and soy oil had any additional benefits over a brief cognitive intervention (BI) on return to work (RTW). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Brief intervention programs are clinically beneficial and cost-effective for patients with low back pain (LBP). CBT is recommended for LBP, but evidence on RTW is lacking. Seal oil has previously been shown to have a possible effect on muscle pain, but no randomized controlled trials have so far been carried out in LBP patients. METHODS: Four hundred thirteen adults aged 18 to 60 years were included. Participants were sick-listed 2 to 10 months due to LBP. Main outcome was objectively ascertained work participation at 12-month follow-up. Participants were randomly assigned to BI (n = 100), BI and CBT (n = 103), BI and seal oil (n = 105), or BI and soy oil (n = 105). BI is a two-session cognitive, clinical examination program followed by two booster sessions, while the CBT program is a tailored, individual, seven-session manual-based treatment. RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, 60% of the participants in the BI group, 50% in the BI and CBT group, 51% in the BI and seal oil group, and 53% in the BI and soy oil group showed reduced sick leave from baseline, and had either partly or fully RTW. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant (χ = 2.54, P = 0.47). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups at any of the other follow-up assessments either, except for a significantly lower sick leave rate in the BI group than the other groups during the first 3 months of follow-up (χ = 9.50, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: CBT and seal oil had no additional benefits over a brief cognitive intervention on sick leave. The brief cognitive intervention alone was superior in facilitating a fast RTW. Cognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (The CINS Trial): A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Trial Comparing a Brief Intervention with Additional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Seal Oil, and Soy Oil for Sick-Listed Low Back Pain Patients The Research Council of Norway, the GC Rieber Funds and Mills DA funds were received in support of this work.

Details

ISSN :
03622436 and 15571564
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Spine, Reme, S E, Tveito, T H, Harris, A, Atle Lie, S, Grasdal, A, Indahl, A, Ivar Brox, J, Tangen, T, Molde Hagen, E, Gismervik, S, Ødegard, A, Frøyland, L, Fors, E, Chalder, T & Eriksen, H R 2016, ' Cognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (The CINS Trial) : A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Trial Comparing a Brief Intervention With Additional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Seal Oil, and Soy Oil for Sick-Listed Low Back Pain Patients ', Spine, vol. 41, no. 20, pp. 1557–1564 . https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001596
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....45c9160685b4478c930a5331fab30e17
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001596