Back to Search Start Over

The Automated External Defibrillator: Heterogeneity of Legislation, Mapping and Use across Europe. New Insights from the ENSURE Study

Authors :
Alexei Birkun
Diana Cimpoesu
Enrico Baldi
Olympia Nikolaidou
Violetta Raffay
Julian Ganter
Martin Quinn
Remy Stieglis
Hajriz Alihodžić
Giuseppe Ristagno
Anneli Strömsöe
Ingvild Tjelmeland
Simone Savastano
Jan Wnent
Ari Salo
Fernando Rosell Ortiz
Bernd W. Böttiger
Carlo Clarens
Niccolò Grieco
Stefan Trenkler
Pierre Mols
Valentine Canon
Jan Thorsten Gräsner
Andrej Markota
Ruggero Cresta
HUS Emergency Medicine and Services
Anestesiologian yksikkö
Cardiology
Graduate School
ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias
ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences
Source :
Journal of Clinical Medicine, Volume 10, Issue 21, Journal of clinical medicine, 10(21):5018. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 5018, p 5018 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
MDPI, 2021.

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) is crucial for increased survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Many factors could play a role in limiting the chance of an AED use. We aimed to verify the situation regarding AED legislation, the AED mapping system and first responders (FRs) equipped with an AED across European countries. Methods: We performed a survey across Europe entitled “European Study about AED Use by Lay Rescuers” (ENSURE), asking the national coordinators of the European Registry of Cardiac Arrest (EuReCa) program to complete it. Results: Nineteen European countries replied to the survey request for a population covering 128,297,955 inhabitants. The results revealed that every citizen can use an AED in 15 countries whereas a training certificate was required in three countries. In one country, only EMS personnel were allowed to use an AED. An AED mapping system and FRs equipped with an AED were available in only 11 countries. The AED use rate was 12–59% where AED mapping and FR systems were implemented, which was considerably higher than in other countries (0–7.9%), reflecting the difference in OHCA survival. Conclusions: Our survey highlighted a heterogeneity in AED legislation, AED mapping systems and AED use in Europe, which was reflected in different AED use and survival.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20770383
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Medicine, Volume 10, Issue 21, Journal of clinical medicine, 10(21):5018. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 5018, p 5018 (2021)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....45ff76be1fd6b8b2c0b456354045c7e3