Back to Search Start Over

Is the face-perception system human-specific at birth?

Authors :
Francesca Simion
Elisa Giorgio
Irene Leo
Olivier Pascalis
Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (LPNC)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 (UPMF)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])
Source :
Developmental Psychology, Developmental Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2012, 48 (4), pp.1083-90. ⟨10.1037/a0026521⟩
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
American Psychological Association:750 First Street Northeast:Washington, DC 20002:(800)374-2721, (202)336-5600, EMAIL: susbscriptions@apa.org, INTERNET: http://www.apa.org, Fax: (202)336-5502, 2012.

Abstract

International audience; The present study investigates the human-specificity of the orienting system that allows neonates to look preferentially at faces. Three experiments were carried out to determine whether the face-perception system that is present at birth is broad enough to include both human and nonhuman primate faces. The results demonstrate that the newborns did not show any spontaneous visual preference for the human face when presented simultaneously with a monkey face that shared the same features, configuration, and low-level perceptual properties (Experiment 1). The newborns were, however, able to discriminate between the 2 faces belonging to the 2 different species (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, the newborns were found to prefer looking at an upright, compared with an inverted, monkey face, as they do for human faces. Overall, the results demonstrate that newborns perceive monkey and human faces in a similar way. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the system underlying face preference at birth is broad enough to bias newborns' attention toward both human and nonhuman primate faces.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00121649
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Developmental Psychology, Developmental Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2012, 48 (4), pp.1083-90. ⟨10.1037/a0026521⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....471c6eefd35bb4d95812a7100c60bc4c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026521⟩