Back to Search Start Over

Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps

Authors :
Venkat Ramakrishnan
Nakul G. Patel
Romulus Ci Jica
Nicholas M Pantelides
Mary Morgan
Source :
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 75:1164-1170
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Summary Introduction When the DIEP flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double TUG flaps and highlight specific technical considerations. Methods Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average BMI was 23.1kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery. Results Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5 hours 50 minutes (195- 460mins) and the mean combined flap weight was 551g (279- 916g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities. Most commonly (n=22), the flaps were orientated horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels. Conclusions Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable.

Details

ISSN :
17486815
Volume :
75
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....47aa32133a49e5e96924b425ef5e40fa
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010