Back to Search Start Over

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Microcephaly at Birth in Brazil in 2010

Authors :
Marco Antonio Barbieri
Rosângela Fernandes Lucena Batista
Zeni Carvalho Lamy
Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britto e Alves
Fernando Lamy-Filho
Vanda Maria Ferreira Simões
Viviane Cunha Cardoso
Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva
Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli
Marizélia Rodrigues Costa Ribeiro
Carolina Abreu de Carvalho
Heloisa Bettiol
Source :
Repositório Institucional da USP (Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), instacron:USP
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the baseline prevalence and risk factors for microcephaly at birth before the Zika virus epidemic in 2 Brazilian cities. METHODS: We used population-based data from the Brazilian Ribeirão Preto (RP) and São Luís (SL) birth cohort studies of 2010 that included hospital deliveries by resident mothers. The final sample was 7376 live births in RP and 4220 in SL. Gestational age was based on the date of the mother’s last normal menstrual period or obstetric ultrasonography, if available. Microcephaly at birth was classified according to the criteria of the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century and the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Risk factors for microcephaly, proportionate and disproportionate microcephaly, and severe microcephaly were estimated in a hierarchized logistic regression model. RESULTS: According to the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century definition, the prevalence of microcephaly (>2 SDs below the mean for gestational age and sex) was higher in SL (3.5%) than in RP (2.5%). The prevalence of severe microcephaly (>3 SDs below the mean) was higher in SL (0.7%) than in RP (0.5%). Low maternal schooling, living in consensual union or without a companion, maternal smoking during pregnancy, primiparity, vaginal delivery, and intrauterine growth restriction were consistently associated with microcephaly. The number of cases of microcephaly is grossly underestimated, with an underreporting rate of ∼90%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of severe microcephaly was much higher than expected in both cities. Our findings suggest that microcephaly was endemic in both municipalities before the circulation of the Zika virus.

Details

ISSN :
10984275
Volume :
141
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pediatrics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....47fa47ee89c43378be6e0cb5a31f9f6e