Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of rectal distension on prostate CBCT-based positioning assessed with 6 degrees-of-freedom couch
- Source :
- Practical Radiation Oncology: An official journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, Practical Radiation Oncology: An official journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, Elsevier, 2018, 8 (5), pp.e322-e328. ⟨10.1016/j.prro.2018.03.001⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2018.
-
Abstract
- International audience; Introduction: Prostate requires a daily correction of its 3-dimensional position in relation with rectal distension. In this study, we sought to determine whether rectal distension with respect to the rectal behavior might have an impact on prostate translations and/or rotations during prostate image guided radiation therapy using a 6 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) couch.Methods and materials: We reviewed the data from 39 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with protracted external radiation therapy using a 6 DOF couch. Before each fraction, a kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) scan was performed. The automatic fusion algorithm was set to fuse on soft tissue and allowed correction for translations in 3 dimensions and rotations in the longitudinal axis ("roll") and lateral axis ("pitch"). After contouring the rectum on each kV-CBCT, we determined the cross-sectional area (CSA) and relative CSA (CSArel) by dividing with the CSA of planning CT. The standard deviation of CSArel per patient was used to classify the patients in 2 groups: patients with a stable rectum and patients with an unstable rectum. The CSArel was compared between these 2 groups with a linear mixed model with group as fixed effect and patient as random effect.Results: A total of 616 kV-CBCT were analyzed, and 2 subgroups of patients could be defined a posteriori: 19 patients had a stable rectum, mean CSArel (1.06 +/- 0.08); the other 20 patients had an unstable rectum, mean CSArel (1.43 +/- 0.08). The average pitch in the group with a stable rectum was 0.36 degrees (+/- 0.21) versus 0.40 degrees (+/- 0.20) (P = .898). The pitch was not correlated with the CSArel (P = -.065, r = 0.119). The average roll in the group with a stable rectum was 0.27 degrees (+/- 0.16) versus 0.05 degrees (+/- 0.16) (P = .137). The roll was not correlated with the CSA (P=.094, r = 0.068). The average CSArel was higher (P = .0013) and more variable (P = .035) in the unstable group.Conclusion: Rectal distension had no impact on the pitch or on the roll, which suggest that a 6 DOF couch has little interest in daily practice for prostate image guided radiation therapy. (C) 2018 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Subjects :
- Male
Kilovoltage Cone Beam Computed Tomography
[SDV.IB.IMA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Imaging
medicine.medical_treatment
78 Gy
Failure
Rectum
[SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer
[SDV.IB.MN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Nuclear medicine
Increased Risk
Standard deviation
Patient Positioning
Trial
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
Prostate cancer
0302 clinical medicine
Prostate
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Conformal Radiation-Therapy
Image-guided radiation therapy
Cancer
Contouring
business.industry
Image-Guidance
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Acute Toxicity
Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy Dosage
External-Beam Radiotherapy
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
medicine.disease
Radiation therapy
medicine.anatomical_structure
Oncology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Feasibility Studies
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Strategies
business
Nuclear medicine
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 18798500
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Practical Radiation Oncology: An official journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, Practical Radiation Oncology: An official journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, Elsevier, 2018, 8 (5), pp.e322-e328. ⟨10.1016/j.prro.2018.03.001⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....487b07a9d4ac519ade8714e01b850c61
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2018.03.001⟩