Back to Search
Start Over
Kinetics and performance of the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assay
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2020.
-
Abstract
- ObjectivesTo assess the performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assay across three clinical settings.MethodsAntibody testing was performed on three clinical cohorts of COVID-19 disease: hospitalised patients with PCR confirmation, hospitalized patients with a clinical diagnosis but negative PCR, and symptomatic healthcare workers (HCW’s). Pre-pandemic respiratory infection sera were tested as negative controls. The sensitivity of the assay was calculated at different time points (20 days, >42 days), and compared between cohorts.ResultsPerformance of the Abbot Architect SARS-CoV-2 assay varied significantly between cohorts. For PCR confirmed hospitalised patients (n = 114), early sensitivity was low: In contrast, 17 out of 114 symptomatic healthcare workers tested at >20 days had negative results, generating a sensitivity of 85.1% (95%CI, 77.4% - 90.5%). All pre-pandemic sera were negative, a specificity of 100%. Seroconversion rates were similar for PCR positive and PCR negative hospitalised cases.ConclusionsThe sensitivity of the Abbot Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay increases over time, with sensitivity not peaking until 20 days post symptoms. Performance varied markedly by setting, with sensitivity significantly worse in symptomatic healthcare workers than in the hospitalised cohort. Clinicians, policymakers, and patients should be aware of the reduced sensitivity in this setting.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
biology
business.industry
Hospitalized patients
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Respiratory infection
Clinical diagnosis
Internal medicine
Cohort
biology.protein
Medicine
Seroconversion
Antibody
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....48fc2bc64ce1d89aa81e98b0e6c61d99
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.03.20145722