Back to Search Start Over

Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies

Authors :
Sofie Adriaanse
Bart N.M. van Berckel
Sandeep S.V. Golla
Maqsood Yaqub
Albert D. Windhorst
Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Ronald Boellaard
ACS - Microcirculation
Radiology and nuclear medicine
Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging
ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias
Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS)
​Basic and Translational Research and Imaging Methodology Development in Groningen (BRIDGE)
Source :
EJNMMI Physics, EJNMMI PHYSICS, 4(1):30. Springer International Publishing AG, EJNMMI physics, 4:30. SpringerOpen, Golla, S S V, Adriaanse, S M, Yaqub, M, Windhorst, A D, Lammertsma, A A, van Berckel, B N M & Boellaard, R 2017, ' Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies ', EJNMMI PHYSICS, vol. 4, no. 1, 30 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0, EJNMMI Physics, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background Several criteria exist to identify the optimal model for quantification of tracer kinetics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correspondence in kinetic model preference identification for brain PET studies among five model selection criteria: Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), AIC unbiased (AICC), model selection criterion (MSC), Schwartz Criterion (SC), and F-test. Materials and Methods Six tracers were evaluated: [11C]FMZ, [11C]GMOM, [11C]PK11195, [11C]Raclopride, [18F]FDG, and [11C]PHT, including data from five subjects per tracer. Time activity curves (TACs) were analysed using six plasma input models: reversible single-tissue model (1T2k), irreversible two-tissue model (2T3k), and reversible two-tissue model (2T4k), all with and without blood volume fraction parameter (V B). For each tracer and criterion, the percentage of TACs preferring a certain model was calculated. Results For all radiotracers, strong agreement was seen across the model selection criteria. The F-test was considered as the reference, as it is a frequently used hypothesis test. The F-test confirmed the AIC preferred model in 87% of all cases. The strongest (but minimal) disagreement across regional TACs was found when comparing AIC with AICC. Despite these regional discrepancies, same preferred kinetic model was obtained using all criteria, with an exception of one FMZ subject. Conclusion In conclusion, all five model selection criteria resulted in similar conclusions with only minor differences that did not affect overall model selection. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Details

ISSN :
21977364
Volume :
4
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
EJNMMI physics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....491e61d181ecc41ecf28b3f675df2a3b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0