Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 N gene real-time RT-PCR targets and commercially available mastermixes

Authors :
Julianne R Brown
Denise M. O'Sullivan
Alexandra S. Whale
Divya Shah
Laura Atkinson
Jim F. Huggett
Rui P A Pereira
Kathryn A. Harris
Eloise J. Busby
Source :
Journal of Virological Methods
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier B.V., 2021.

Abstract

Background This study aimed to evaluate the impact of four different reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) master mixes on the performance of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic PCRs using three primer/probe assays targeting the N gene (A, B and C). The dynamic range and lowest detected quantity was determined using a SARS-CoV-2 partial N gene RNA transcript dilution series (100,000–1 copy/μl) and verified using 72 nose and throat swabs, 29 of which tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Results Assay C consistently detected the lowest quantity of partial N gene RNA transcript with all mastermixes. The Takara One Step PrimeScript™ III RT-PCR Kit mastermix enabled all primer pairs to detect the entire dynamic range evaluated, with the Qiagen Quantifast and Thermofisher TaqPath 1-Step kits also performing well. Sequences from all three primer/probe sets tested in this study (assay A, B and C) have 100 % homology to ≥97 % of the of SARS-CoV-2 sequences available up to 31st December 2020 (n = 291,483 sequences). Conclusions This work demonstrates that specific assays (in this case assay C) can perform well in terms of dynamic range and lowest detected quantity regardless of the mastermix used. However we also show that, by choosing the most appropriate mastermix, poorer performing primer pairs are also able to detect all of the template dilutions investigated. This work increases the potential options when choosing assays for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and provides solutions to enable them to work with optimal analytical sensitivity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18790984 and 01660934
Volume :
295
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Virological Methods
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....499479e430cff826df738708a383ef9f