Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V on Coronary Artery Calcium Scores Obtained From Low-Tube-Voltage Computed Tomography - A Patient Study

Authors :
Aju P. Pazhenkottil
Dimitri Patriki
Philipp A. Kaufmann
Joel Lutz
Wenjie Huang
Tobias A. Fuchs
Dominik C. Benz
Catherine Gebhard
Christel H. Kamani
Andreas A. Giannopoulos
Christoph Gräni
Elia von Felten
Moritz Schwyzer
Ronny R. Buechel
University of Zurich
Buechel, Ronny R
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) on the accuracy of ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. MATERIALS AND METHOD One-hundred-and-three patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) for CAC scoring were prospectively included. All underwent standard scanning with 120-kilovolt-peak (kVp) and with 80- and 70-kVp tube voltage. ASiR-V was applied to the 80- and 70-kVp scans at different levels. The 120-kVp scans reconstructed with filtered back projection served as the standard of reference. Recently published novel kVp-adapted thresholds were used for calculation of CAC scores from 80- and 70-kVp scans and the resulting CAC scores were compared against the standard of reference. Patients were stratified into six CAC score risk categories: 0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, 401-1000, and >1000. RESULTS Increasing levels of ASIR-V led to an increasing underestimation of CAC scores with bias ranging from -128 to -118 and from -205 to -198 for the 80- and 70-kVp scans, respectively, when compared with the standard of reference. Reconstruction with 20% and 40% ASIR-V for the 80- and 70-kVp scans, respectively, yielded noise levels comparable to the standard of reference. Nevertheless, a change in risk-class was observed in 29 (28.6%) and 46 (44.7%) patients, exclusively to a lower risk-class, when CAC scores were derived from these reconstructions. CONCLUSION ASIR-V leads to noise reduction in CT scans acquired with low tube-voltages. However, ASIR-V introduces substantial inaccuracies and marked underestimation of ultra-low-dose CAC scoring as compared with standard-dose CAC scoring despite normalization of noise.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....49bb56d60ab2f3dd2aaf04cbb5931ff8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.48350/176411