Back to Search Start Over

Mass testing and treatment for malaria followed by weekly fever screening, testing and treatment in Northern Senegal: feasibility, cost and impact

Authors :
Duncan Earle
Doudou Sene
Mady Ba
Adama Tall
Ruben O. Conner
Badara Cisse
Caterina Guinovart
Moustapha Cisse
Farba B.K. Faye
Yakou Dieye
Tidiane Thiam
Amadou Ba
Moussa Diop
Souleymane Ba
Philippe Guinot
Michael Hainsworth
Elhadji Doucouré
Richard W. Steketee
Mame Demba Sy
Kammerle Schneider
Source :
Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona, Malaria Journal, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2020), Malaria Journal
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND NlmCategory: BACKGROUND content: Population-wide interventions using malaria testing and treatment might decrease the reservoir of Plasmodium falciparum infection and accelerate towards elimination. Questions remain about their effectiveness and evidence from different transmission settings is needed. - Label: METHODS NlmCategory: METHODS content: "A pilot quasi-experimental study to evaluate a package of population-wide test and treat interventions was conducted in six health facility catchment areas (HFCA) in the districts of Kanel, Lingu\xC3\xA8re, and Ran\xC3\xA9rou (Senegal). Seven adjacent HFCAs were selected as comparison. Villages within the intervention HFCAs were stratified according to the 2013 incidences of passively detected malaria cases, and those with an incidence\xE2\x80\x89\xE2\x89\xA5\xE2\x80\x8915 cases/1000/year were targeted for a mass test and treat (MTAT) in September 2014. All households were visited, all consenting individuals were tested with a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), and, if positive, treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. This was followed by weekly screening, testing and treatment of fever cases (PECADOM++) until the end of the transmission season in January 2015. Villages with lower incidence received only PECADOM++ or case investigation. To evaluate the impact of the interventions over that transmission season, the incidence of passively detected, RDT-confirmed malaria cases was compared between the intervention and comparison groups with a difference-in-difference analysis using negative binomial regression with random effects on HFCA." - Label: RESULTS NlmCategory: RESULTS content: "During MTAT, 89% (2225/2503) of households were visited and 86% (18,992/22,170) of individuals were tested, for a combined 77% effective coverage. Among those tested, 291 (1.5%) were RDT positive (range 0-10.8 by village), of whom 82% were\xE2\x80\x89

Details

ISSN :
14752875
Volume :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Malaria Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4b2254a34aa823d36c680df33d0ec46f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03313-6