Back to Search Start Over

COVID-19 and Neurointerventional Service Worldwide: A Survey of the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS), the Sociedad Iberolatinoamericana De Neuroradiologia Diagnostica Y Terapeutica (SILAN), the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN), and the World Federation of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (WFITN)

Authors :
Joshua A Hirsch
Jens Fiehler
James Milburn
William J. Mack
Carlos Díaz
Darren B. Orbach
José Manuel Pumar
Italo Linfante
Zsolt Kulcsar
Patrick A. Brouwer
Michihiro Tanaka
Raul G Nogueira
Allan Taylor
Pedro Lylyk
David S Liebeskind
University of Zurich
Source :
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 12(8), 726-730. BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

BackgroundThis survey was focused on the provision of neurointerventional services, the current practices of managing patients under COVID-19 conditions, and the expectations for the future.MethodsInvitations for this survey were sent out as a collaborative effort of the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS), the Sociedad Iberolatinoamericana de Neuroradiologia Diagnostica y Terapeutica (SILAN), the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN), and the World Federation of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (WFITN).ResultsOverall, 475 participants from 61 countries responded (six from Africa (1%), 81 from Asia (17%), 156 from Europe (33%), 53 from Latin America (11%), and 172 from North America (11%)). The majority of participants (96%) reported being able to provide emergency services, though 26% of these reported limited resources. A decrease in emergency procedures was reported by 69% of participants (52% in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, 11% ischemic, and 6% hemorrhagic stroke alone). Only 4% reported an increase in emergency cases. The emerging need for social distancing and the rapid adoption of remote communication was reflected in the interest in establishing case discussion forums (43%), general online forums (37%), and access to angio video streaming for live mentoring and support (33%).ConclusionNeurointerventional emergency services are available in almost all centers, while the number of emergency patients is markedly decreased. Half of the participants have abandoned neurointerventions in non-emergent situations. There are considerable variations in the management of neurointerventions and in the expectations for the future.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 12(8), 726-730. BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4b8151e55e568a44bf211ab31288943c