Back to Search
Start Over
Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study
- Source :
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2019)
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background Fetal weight estimation is of key importance in the decision-making process for obstetric planning and management. The literature is inconsistent on the accuracy of measurements with either ultrasound or clinical examination, known as Leopold’s manoeuvres, shortly before term. Maternal BMI is a confounding factor because it is associated with both the fetal weight and the accuracy of fetal weight estimation. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of fetal weight estimation performed with ultrasound and with clinical examination with respect to BMI. Methods In this prospective blinded observational study we investigated the accuracy of clinical examination as compared to ultrasound measurement in fetal weight estimation, taking the actual birth weight as the gold standard. In a cohort of all consecutive patients who presented in our department from January 2016 to May 2017 to register for delivery at ≥37 weeks, examination was done by ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres to estimate fetal weight. All examiners (midwives and physicians) had about the same level of professional experience. The primary aim was to compare overall absolute error, overall absolute percent error, absolute percent error > 10% and absolute percent error > 20% for weight estimation by ultrasound and by means of Leopold’s manoeuvres versus the actual birth weight as the given gold standard, namely separately for normal weight and for overweight pregnant women. Results Five hundred forty-three patients were included in the data analysis. The accuracy of fetal weight estimation was significantly better with ultrasound than with Leopold’s manoeuvres in all absolute error calculations made in overweight pregnant women. For all error calculations performed in normal weight pregnant women, no statistically significant difference was seen in the accuracy of fetal weight estimation between ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres. Conclusions Data from our prospective blinded observational study show a significantly better accuracy of ultrasound for fetal weight estimation in overweight pregnant women only as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres with a significant difference in absolute error. We did not observe significantly better accuracy of ultrasound as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres in normal weight women. Further research is needed to analyse the situation in normal weight women.
- Subjects :
- Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Term Birth
Birth weight
Clinical examination
Physical examination
Overweight
lcsh:Gynecology and obstetrics
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis
Ultrasound
Birth Weight
Humans
Medicine
Single-Blind Method
Prospective Studies
030212 general & internal medicine
Normal weight
Physical Examination
lcsh:RG1-991
Body mass index
Estimated fetal weight
Palpation
030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine
Anthropometry
medicine.diagnostic_test
Prospective blinded observational study
business.industry
Obstetrics
Gold standard
Infant, Newborn
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Fetal Weight
Fetal weight estimation
Cohort
Female
Observational study
medicine.symptom
business
Research Article
Leopold’s manoeuvres
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14712393
- Volume :
- 19
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....4cd70ba01bf7c62cfa0c65b3bdc84d3d
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2251-5