Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of the McPeek postoperative outcome score in three trials

Authors :
Alexander Torossian
Artur Bauhofer
Ilhan Celik
Henrik Menke
Helmut Sitter
Wilfried Lorenz
Christoph Nies
Hinnerk Wulf
Michael Koller
Daniel I. Sessler
Source :
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 391:418-427
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2006.

Abstract

Postoperative outcome of patients is determined by recovery characteristics and self-reported quality of life. The first can be assessed with the McPeek score which values three aspects of recovery: mortality, postoperative critical care and duration of hospitalization. We calculated the McPeek score of 669 patients in three trials: (1) colorectal cancer surgery, (2) antihistamine/volume loading in various operations, and (3) cholecystectomy. Beforehand, the average of intensive care unit treatment and duration of hospitalization were determined for the different operations to define McPeek score points. The score was tested on reliability, validity, and sensitivity. In addition, clinical applicability was assessed in a survey. The score was reliable with similarly distributed score points in the three trials at different institutions. Inter-rater reliability was high (97% overlap). Validity was proven by moderate high correlation to convergent criteria such as complications (trial I to III r=0.43, r=0.38, r=0.60), preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists class (ASA) (r=0.24, r=0.28, r=0.57), and age (r=0.23, r=0.32, r=0.31). The score was different between patients with and without neoplasms (P

Details

ISSN :
14352451 and 14352443
Volume :
391
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4f0c50cbe2884b66686115451fc3abc6