Back to Search Start Over

Using Successive Self-Nucleation and Annealing to Detect the Solid–Solid Transitions in Poly(hexamethylene carbonate) and Poly(octamethylene carbonate)

Authors :
Alejandro J. Müller
Dujin Wang
Ricardo A. Pérez-Camargo
Haritz Sardon
Guoming Liu
Ying Zhao
Leire Meabe
European Commission
Source :
Macromolecules, Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación, instname
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
American Chemical Society (ACS), 2021.

Abstract

Unformatted post-print version of the accepted article Solid-solid transitions in poly (hexamethylene carbonate) (PC6) and poly (octamethylene carbonate) (PC8), denoted δ to α transition, have been investigated, using self-nucleation and Successive Self-nucleation and Annealing (SSA) technique. The SSA protocol was performed in-situ for thermal (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)), structural (Wide-angle X-ray Scattering (WAXS)), and conformational (Fourier-transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)) characterization. The final heating after SSA fractionation displayed an enhanced (compared to a standard second DSC heating scan) endothermic and unfractionated peak signal at low temperatures corresponding to the δ to α transition. The improved (i.e., higher enthalpy and temperature than in other crystallization conditions) δ to α transition signal is produced by annealing the thickest lamellae made up by α and β phase crystals after SSA treatment. As thicker lamellae are annealed, more significant changes are produced in the δ to α transition, demonstrating the transition dependence on crystal stability, thus, on the crystallization conditions. The ability of SSA to significantly enhance the observed solid-solid transitions makes it an ideal tool to detect and study this type of transitions. In-situ WAXS reveals that the δ to α transition corresponds to a change in the unit cell dimensions, evidenced by an increase in the d-spacing. This implies a more efficient chain packing in the crystal, for both samples, in the δ phase (lower d-spacing at low temperatures) than in the α phase (higher d-spacing at high temperatures). The chain packing differences are explained through in-situ FT-IR measurements that show the transition from ordered (δ phase) to disordered (α phase) methylene chain conformations. We would like to acknowledge financial support provided by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFE0117800) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51820105005, 21922308, and 52050410327). We also acknowledge financial support from the BIODEST project; this project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 778092. This work has also received funding from MINECO through project MAT2017-83014-C2-1-P and from the Basque Government through grant IT1309-19. R.A.P.-C is supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M670462). G.L. is grateful to the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y201908). We also thank the BSRF (beamline 1W2A) for providing beamtime.

Details

ISSN :
15205835 and 00249297
Volume :
54
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Macromolecules
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4fa249067dcb663fa166da49a21bbdf2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01856