Back to Search
Start Over
How norm violations shape social hierarchies: Those who stand on top block norm violators from rising up
- Source :
- Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(5), 608-629. SAGE Publications Ltd
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- SAGE Publications, 2016.
-
Abstract
- Norm violations engender both negative reactions and perceptions of power from observers. We addressed this paradox by examining whether observers’ tendency to grant power to norm followers versus norm violators is moderated by the observer’s position in the hierarchy. Because norm violations threaten the status quo, we hypothesized that individuals higher in a hierarchy (high verticality) would be less likely to grant power to norm violators compared to individuals lower in the hierarchy (low verticality). In 14 studies ( Ntotal = 1,704), we measured participants’ trait verticality (sense of power, socioeconomic status, testosterone) and manipulated state verticality (power position, status, dominance). A meta-analysis revealed that higher ranked participants granted less power to norm violators than lower ranked individuals, presumably because the former support social stratification. Interestingly, these effects occurred for trait but not state verticality. Overall, negative reactions to deviants may be driven by hierarchy-maintenance motives by those in privileged positions.
- Subjects :
- Cultural Studies
Sociology and Political Science
Social Psychology
Status quo
Communication
media_common.quotation_subject
05 social sciences
050109 social psychology
Social stratification
050105 experimental psychology
Dominance hierarchy
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Perception
Intergroup dynamics
Trait
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Norm (social)
Psychology
Socioeconomic status
Social psychology
media_common
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14617188 and 13684302
- Volume :
- 19
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....50646f94c1955e2a167f6505a32f0c0a
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216641305