Back to Search Start Over

Optimal Chest Drainage Method After Anatomic Lung Resection: A Prospective Observational Study

Authors :
Hiroyuki Adachi
Shin Wakimoto
Kohei Ando
Taketsugu Yamamoto
Yuichi Saito
Satoshi Shiono
Tekkan Woo
Hiroyuki Ito
Yukinori Sakao
Noriyoshi Sawabata
Source :
The Annals of thoracic surgery.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Several methods for chest drainage after pulmonary resection of malignant lung tumors exist, but consensus on the ideal method has not been reached.We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study. We enrolled 2200 patients who underwent lung resection for lung tumors. Of the 1470 patients who underwent anatomic resection, 347 showed air leak on the morning of postoperative day 1. They were assigned to 3 groups according to the chest drainage method on postoperative day 1.Of 347 patients with postoperative air leaks, 107 (30.8%), 179 (51.6%), and 61 (17.6%) were assigned to water seal, continuous suction, and digital drainage, respectively. The median postoperative air leak duration was significantly longer with digital drainage (4.0 days) than with either water seal (2.5 days) or continuous suction (3.0 days; P = .009). Chest tubes were required for significantly more days on average with digital drainage (6.0 days) than with water seal (4.0 days) or continuous suction (4.0 days; P = .003). Prolongation of air leak duration was significantly more likely to occur in patients with body mass index18.5 kg/mWater seal was associated with significantly shorter duration of postoperative air leak and chest drainage compared with continuous suction and digital drainage.

Details

ISSN :
15526259
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Annals of thoracic surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5066bb31f91e6003f34917bb743964a3