Back to Search Start Over

A validated prognostic classifier for BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer : the ‘BRAF BeCool’ study

Authors :
Salvatore Siena
Francesco Leone
Daniele Santini
Lorenza Rimassa
Francesca Negri
Fotios Loupakis
Matteo Fassan
Emmanuele De Luca
Pina Ziranu
Stefano Cascinu
Armando Orlandi
Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
Carlotta Antoniotti
Fable Zustovich
Sara Lonardi
Emanuela Dell'Aquila
Chiara Cremolini
Rossana Intini
Lisa Salvatore
Federica Urbano
Marta Schirripa
Lorenzo Calvetti
Massimo Di Maio
Nicoletta Pella
Antonio Avallone
Filippo Pietrantonio
Andrea Spallanzani
Alessandra Anna Prete
Federica Morano
Mario Scartozzi
Samantha Di Donato
Giuseppe Aprile
Vittorina Zagonel
Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Roberto Moretto
Paola Biason
Gianluca Tomasello
Ilaria Depetris
Vincenzo Formica
Elena Ongaro
Maria Alessandra Calegari
Pasquale Buonandi
Hans Prenen
Federica Buggin
Source :
European Journal of Cancer
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background Despite the well-known negative prognostic value of the V600EBRAF mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), its outcome is quite heterogeneous, and the basis for this prognostic heterogeneity should be better defined. Methods Two large retrospective series of V600EBRAF-mutated mCRC from 22 institutions served as an exploratory and validation set to develop a prognostic score. The model was internally and externally validated. Results A total of 395 V600EBRAF-mutated mCRCs were included in the exploratory set. Performance status, CA19.9, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, grading and liver, lung and nodal involvement emerged as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Two different scoring systems were built: a ‘complete’ score (0–16) including all significant covariates and a ‘simplified’ score (0–9), based only on clinicopathological covariates, and excluding laboratory values. Adopting the complete score, proportions of patients with a low (0–4), intermediate (5–8) and high (9–16) score were 44.7%, 42.6% and 12.6%, respectively. The median OS was 29.6, 15.5 (hazard ratio [HR] for intermediate vs low risk: 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44–3.22, p Conclusions These scoring systems are based on easy-to-collect data and defined specific subgroups with relevant differences in their life expectancy. These tools could be useful in clinical practice, would allow better stratification of patients in clinical trials and may be adopted for proper adjustments in exploratory translational analyses.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09598049
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....51594a2476c921704de4fb632badb19d