Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of radial, brachial, and femoral accesses using hemostatic devices for percutaneous coronary intervention
- Source :
- Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics. 33(1)
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Some studies have suggested that radial access (RA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces vascular complications and bleeding compared to femoral access (FA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the routine use of hemostatic devices and bleeding complications among RA, brachial access (BA), and FA. Between January 2015 and December 2015, 298 patients treated for PCI with RA were compared with 158 patients using BA and 206 patients using FA. The radial sheath was routinely removed with ADAPTY, the brachial sheath with BLEED SAFE, and the femoral sheath with Perclose ProGlide. In-hospital bleeding complications were investigated. Cardiogenic shock was most frequent in patients in the femoral group (RA 1.3%, BA 2.5%, FA 9.2%, p
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Brachial Artery
medicine.medical_treatment
Hemorrhage
Coronary Artery Disease
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
03 medical and health sciences
Pseudoaneurysm
0302 clinical medicine
Hematoma
Femoral sheath
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
030212 general & internal medicine
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Cardiogenic shock
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Interventional radiology
General Medicine
Bleed
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Hemostasis, Surgical
Surgery
Femoral Artery
medicine.anatomical_structure
Anesthesia
Conventional PCI
Radial Artery
Female
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Aneurysm, False
Vascular Closure Devices
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 18684297
- Volume :
- 33
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....523858c6f02baa849087144ad1e864b3