Back to Search Start Over

Potassium Recovery from Potassium Solution and Seawater Using Different Adsorbents

Authors :
Hyun-Ju Park
Eun Hea Jho
Sora Shin
Sungjong Lee
Joon Ha Kim
Source :
Applied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 8660, p 8660 (2021), Applied Sciences, Volume 11, Issue 18
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2021.

Abstract

The potassium (K) sorption characteristics with three adsorbents, natural zeolite, ammonium acetate-treated zeolite, and manganese nodule, were studied and compared to see the potential use of manganese nodule as an alternative K adsorbent. In general, the Langmuir isotherm could fit the K sorption in the KCl solutions at different pH conditions better than the Freundlich isotherm. Based on the Langmuir parameters, the maximum K sorption was greater for the zeolite-based adsorbents (i.e., 40–42 mg g−1) than the manganese nodule (i.e., 2.0 mg g−1) at acidic conditions, while the manganese nodule (i.e., 9.7 mg g−1) showed better K sorption at neutral conditions. With the seawater samples, the zeolite-based adsorbents showed higher K recovery (4–14%) than the manganese nodule (0–8.8%). The K sorption on the zeolite-based adsorbents followed the pseudo-second-order kinetics and the K sorption rates were higher for the treated zeolite than the natural zeolite. The repeated sorption tests showed that the natural zeolite could potentially be reused up to three times without any significant loss of K sorption capacity, while the ammonium acetate-treated zeolite lost its K sorption capacity after the single sorption test. Overall, the results show that the manganese nodule may potentially be the alternative to zeolite for K recovery under certain conditions, yet the zeolite-based adsorbents are generally better than the manganese nodule. Thus, more studies to enhance the K recovery using zeolite, including surface modified zeolite, are recommended.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20763417
Volume :
11
Issue :
8660
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Applied Sciences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....52d29ebc7cdc679d842c852294f113b6