Back to Search Start Over

Predicted impact of extending the screening interval for diabetic retinopathy: the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Screening programme

Authors :
Paul M. McKeigue
Sarah H. Wild
S O Nyangoma
Helen M. Colhoun
Andrew D. Morris
M. W. Black
Helen C. Looker
N. Lee
Graham P. Leese
Sam Philip
D. W. M. Pearson
Robert S. Lindsay
Eleanor J Hothersall
Jennifer Doig
Andrew Briggs
J. A. Olson
John A. McKnight
Naveed Sattar
D. T. Cromie
Source :
Looker, H C, Nyangoma, S O, Cromie, D T, Olson, J A, Leese, G P, Philip, S, Black, M W, Doig, J, Lee, N, Briggs, A, Hothersall, E J, Morris, A, Lindsay, R S, McKnight, J A, Pearson, D W M, Sattar, N A, Wild, S H & McKeigue, P & Colhoun, H M 2013, ' Predicted impact of extending the screening interval for diabetic retinopathy : the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Screening programme ', Diabetologia, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1716-25 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-2928-7, Diabetologia
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2013.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis The aim of our study was to identify subgroups of patients attending the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Screening (DRS) programme who might safely move from annual to two yearly retinopathy screening. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of screening data from the DRS programme collected between 2005 and 2011 for people aged ≥12 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in Scotland. We used hidden Markov models to calculate the probabilities of transitions to referable diabetic retinopathy (referable background or proliferative retinopathy) or referable maculopathy. Results The study included 155,114 individuals with no referable diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy at their first DRS examination and with one or more further DRS examinations. There were 11,275 incident cases of referable diabetic eye disease (9,204 referable maculopathy, 2,071 referable background or proliferative retinopathy). The observed transitions to referable background or proliferative retinopathy were lower for people with no visible retinopathy vs mild background retinopathy at their prior examination (respectively, 1.2% vs 8.1% for type 1 diabetes and 0.6% vs 5.1% for type 2 diabetes). The lowest probability for transitioning to referable background or proliferative retinopathy was among people with two consecutive screens showing no visible retinopathy, where the probability was

Details

ISSN :
14320428 and 0012186X
Volume :
56
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Diabetologia
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5468bd6673269e42c5ae79718da712aa
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-2928-7