Back to Search Start Over

SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference

Authors :
Tommaso Leo
Anna Castagna
Zimi Sawacha
Marco Rabuffetti
Fabiola Spolaor
L. Piccinini
L. Cavazzuti
M. Manca
Andrea Giovanni Cutti
Federica Verdini
Antonio De Tanti
Maurizio Petrarca
Giuseppe Vannozzi
Andrea Ravaschio
Ugo Della Croce
Maurizio Ferrarin
Rita Stagni
Ettore Beghi
P. Marchi
Andrea Cereatti
Marco Gasperi
Valentina Camomilla
Martina Del Maestro
Nino Basaglia
Maria Grazia Benedetti
Isabella Campanini
Luigi Tesio
Claudia Mazzà
Aurelio Cappozzo
Silvia Fantozzi
Isabella Visintin
Benedetti, Maria Grazia
Beghi, Ettore
De Tanti, Antonio
Cappozzo, Aurelio
Basaglia, Nino
Cutti, Andrea Giovanni
Cereatti, Andrea
Stagni, Rita
Verdini, Federica
Manca, Mario
Fantozzi, Silvia
Mazzã , Claudia
Camomilla, Valentina
Campanini, Isabella
Castagna, Anna
Cavazzuti, Lorenzo
Del Maestro, Martina
Croce, Ugo Della
Gasperi, Marco
Leo, Tommaso
Marchi, Pia
Petrarca, Maurizio
Piccinini, Luigi
Rabuffetti, Marco
Ravaschio, Andrea
Sawacha, Zimi
Spolaor, Fabiola
Tesio, Luigi
Vannozzi, Giuseppe
Visintin, Isabella
Ferrarin, Maurizio
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Elsevier B.V., 2017.

Abstract

Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts’ opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09666362
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5472edd574e1b50c6cb98d43785164fc