Back to Search Start Over

Use of combined hormonal contraceptives among women with systemic lupus erythematosus with and without medical contraindications to oestrogen

Authors :
Evelyne Vinet
Andreas Jönsen
Ronald F van Vollenhoven
Ann E. Clarke
Giuillermo Ruiz-Irastorza
Anca D. Askanase
Arielle Mendel
Mary Anne Dooley
Diane L. Kamen
Graciela S. Alarcón
Jill P. Buyon
Juanita Romero-Diaz
Meggan Mackay
Susan Manzi
Munther A. Khamashta
Manuel Ramos-Casals
Ian N. Bruce
David A. Isenberg
Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero
Asad Zoma
Joan T. Merrill
Caroline Gordon
Sasha Bernatsky
Daniel J. Wallace
Kenneth C. Kalunian
Michelle Petri
Yvan St-Pierre
Anisur Rahman
Murat Inanc
Dafna D. Gladman
Christian A. Pineau
Ellen M. Ginzler
Murray B. Urowitz
Kristjan Steinsson
Søren Jacobsen
Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
Paul R. Fortin
Sang Cheol Bae
Cynthia Aranow
John G. Hanly
S. Sam Lim
Ola Nived
Christine A. Peschken
Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau
Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology
AII - Inflammatory diseases
AMS - Ageing & Morbidty
Source :
Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 58(7), 1259-1267. Oxford University Press, Rheumatology (Oxford, England), vol 58, iss 7
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objectives To assess the prevalence of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in reproductive-age women with SLE with and without possible contraindications and to determine factors associated with their use in the presence of possible contraindications. Methods This observational cohort study included premenopausal women ages 18–45 years enrolled in the SLICC Registry ⩽15 months after SLE onset, with annual assessments spanning 2000–2017. World Health Organization Category 3 or 4 contraindications to CHCs (e.g. hypertension, aPL) were assessed at each study visit. High disease activity (SLEDAI score >12 or use of >0.5 mg/kg/day of prednisone) was considered a relative contraindication. Results A total of 927 SLE women contributed 6315 visits, of which 3811 (60%) occurred in the presence of one or more possible contraindication to CHCs. Women used CHCs during 512 (8%) visits, of which 281 (55%) took place in the setting of one or more possible contraindication. The most frequently observed contraindications were aPL (52%), hypertension (34%) and migraine with aura (22%). Women with one or more contraindication were slightly less likely to be taking CHCs [7% of visits (95% CI 7, 8)] than women with no contraindications [9% (95% CI 8, 10)]. Conclusion CHC use was low compared with general population estimates (>35%) and more than half of CHC users had at least one possible contraindication. Many yet unmeasured factors, including patient preferences, may have contributed to these observations. Further work should also aim to clarify outcomes associated with this exposure.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14620324
Volume :
58
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....55ae6b74a3d11c59dc63b97718f95e8a