Back to Search Start Over

Data from Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems

Authors :
Carolyn M. Rutter
Virginia P. Quinn
Beverly B. Green
Joanne E. Schottinger
Theodore R. Levin
Aruna Kamineni
Chyke A. Doubeni
Carrie N. Klabunde
Amit G. Singal
Ethan A. Halm
Douglas A. Corley
Yingye Zheng
Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman
Michael P. Garcia
Jessica Chubak
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2023.

Abstract

Background: To reduce colorectal cancer mortality, positive fecal blood tests must be followed by colonoscopy.Methods: We identified 62,384 individuals ages 50 to 89 years with a positive fecal blood test between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012 in four health care systems within the Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) consortium. We estimated the probability of follow-up colonoscopy and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the Kaplan–Meier method. Overall differences in cumulative incidence of follow-up across health care systems were assessed with the log-rank test. HRs and 95% CIs were estimated from multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.Results: Most patients who received a colonoscopy did so within 6 months of their positive fecal blood test, although follow-up rates varied across health care systems (P Conclusion: Individual characteristics and health care system were associated with colonoscopy after positive fecal blood tests. Patterns were consistent across health care systems, but proportions of patients receiving follow-up varied. These findings suggest that there is room to improve follow-up of positive colorectal cancer screening tests.Impact: Understanding the timing of colonoscopy after positive fecal blood tests and characteristics associated with lack of follow-up may inform future efforts to improve follow-up. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(2); 344–50. ©2016 AACR.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....566101fc7e61d56bf39df874e93ec155
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.c.6516384