Back to Search Start Over

Morphological integration during postnatal ontogeny: implications for evolutionary biology

Authors :
Alex Hubbe
Fabio A. Machado
Diogo Melo
Guilherme Garcia
Harley SebastiĆ£o
Arthur Porto
James Cheverud
Gabriel Marroig
Source :
Evolution. 77:763-775
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022.

Abstract

Understanding how development changes the genetic covariance of complex phenotypes is fundamental for the study of evolution. If the genetic covariance changes dramatically during postnatal ontogeny, one cannot infer confidently evolutionary responses based on the genetic covariance estimated from a single postnatal ontogenetic stage. Mammalian skull morphology is a common model system for studying the evolution of complex structures. These studies often involve estimating covariance between traits based on adult individuals. There is robust evidence that covariances changes during ontogeny. However, it is unknown whether differences in age-specific covariances can, in fact, bias evolutionary analyses made at subadult ages. To explore this issue, we sampled two marsupials from the order Didelphimorphia, and one precocial and one altricial placental at different stages of postnatal ontogeny. We calculated the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix (P-matrix) for each genera at these postnatal ontogenetic stages. Then, we compared within genus P-matrices and also P-matrices with available congeneric additive genetic variance-covariance matrices (G-matrices) using Random Skewers and the Krzanowsky projection methods. Our results show that the structural similarity between matrices are in general high (> 0.7). Our study supports that the G-matrix in therian mammals is conserved during most of postnatal ontogeny. Thus it is feasible to study life-history changes and evolutionary responses based on the covariance estimated from a single ontogenetic stage. Our results also suggest that at least for some marsupials the G-matrix varies considerably prior to weaning, which does not invalidate our previous conclusion because specimens at this stage would experience striking differences in selective regimes than during later ontogenetic stages.

Details

ISSN :
15585646 and 00143820
Volume :
77
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Evolution
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....56f76f686e544cdb62cec19b8176e8b6
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpac052