Back to Search Start Over

Not by transmission alone : the role of invention in cultural evolution

Authors :
Susan Perry
Marco Smolla
Susan D. Healy
Alecia J. Carter
Erol Akçay
Sabine Nöbel
Jacob G. Foster
Templeton World Charity Foundation
University of St Andrews. School of Biology
University of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversity
University of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences
University of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolution
Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST)
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole (UT1)
Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Source :
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2021, vol.376 (n°1828), ⟨10.31235/osf.io/x2acu⟩, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, vol 376, iss 1828
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

We are grateful to the Templeton World Charity Foundation, Inc. for funding this work and to the Diverse Intelligences research community for valuable conversations around these themes. S. Nöbel acknowledges IAST funding from the French National Research Agency (ANR) under the Investissements d’Avenir program, grant ANR-17-EUR-0010 and support by the Laboratoires d’Excellence TULIP (ANR-10-LABX-41). EA and MS acknowledge support from the US Army Research Office (W911NF‐17‐1‐0017 to EA). Innovation—the combination of invention and social learning—can empower species to invade new niches via cultural adaptation. Social learning has typically been regarded as the fundamental driver for the emergence of traditions and thus culture. Consequently, invention has been relatively understudied outside the human lineage—despite being the source of new traditions. This neglect leaves basic questions unanswered: what factors promote the creation of new ideas and practices? What affects their spread or loss? We critically review the existing literature, focusing on four levels of investigation: traits (what sorts of behaviours are easiest to invent?), individuals (what factors make some individuals more likely to be inventors?), ecological contexts (what aspects of the environment make invention or transmission more likely?), and populations (what features of relationships and societies promote the rise and spread of new inventions?). We aim to inspire new research by highlighting theoretical and empirical gaps in the study of innovation, focusing primarily on inventions in non-humans. Understanding the role of invention and innovation in the history of life requires a well-developed theoretical framework (which embraces cognitive processes) and a taxonomically broad, cross-species dataset that explicitly investigates inventions and their transmission. We outline such an agenda here. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Foundations of cultural evolution’. Publisher PDF

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09628436 and 14712970
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2021, vol.376 (n°1828), ⟨10.31235/osf.io/x2acu⟩, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, vol 376, iss 1828
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5782eeee354eced890d975196f13feb7